The positive outcome of philosophyDietzgen, Joseph
Philosophy
The positive outcome of philosophy
Dietzgen, Joseph
Knowledge, Theory of; Logic; Philosophy
The difference between speculative and inductive science is that between
fantasy and sound common sense. The latter produces its ideas by means
of the outer world, by the help of experience, while fantasy gets its
product from the depth of the mind, out of itself. But this method of
production is only seemingly one-sided. A thinker can no more think
transcendental thoughts which are beyond the reach of experience, than a
painter can invent transcendental pictures, transcendental forms. Just
as fantasy creates angels by a combination of man and bird, or mermaids
by a composition of woman and fish, so all other products of fantasy,
though seemingly derived out of itself, are in fact only arbitrarily
arranged impressions of the outer world. Reason operates with numbers
and orders, time and measures, and other means of experience, while
fantasy reproduces the experiences without regard to law and in an
arbitrary form.
The longing for knowledge has been the cause of speculative attempts to
explain the phenomena of life and nature at a time when lack of
experience and observation made inductive understanding impossible.
Experience was then supplemented by speculation. In later times, when
experience had grown, previous speculation was generally recognized as
erroneous. But it nevertheless required thousands of years of repeated
disappointments on one side and numerous brilliant successes of the
inductive method on the other, before these speculative hobbies came
into disfavor.
Fantasy has certainly a positive power, and speculative intuition,
derived from analogy, very often precedes empirical and inductive
understanding. But we must remain aware of the fact that so much is
assumption and so much actual scientific knowledge. Conscious intuition
stimulates scientific research, while pseudo-science closes the door to
inductive research. The acquisition of the clear understanding of the
distinction between speculation and knowledge is a historical process,
the beginning and end of which coincides with the beginning and end of
speculative philosophy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account