The Power of Conscience, exemplified in the genuine and extraordinary confession of Thomas Bedworth: delivered to one of the principal officers of Newgate, the night before his execution on September 18, 1815, for the murder of Elizabeth Beesmore in Drury lane. Relating his horrible sufferings until compelled to surrender to public justice by the constant supernatural visitations of the murdered woman, and the frequent appearance of her apparition. From the original paper now in the possession oBedworth, Thomas
History
The Power of Conscience, exemplified in the genuine and extraordinary confession of Thomas Bedworth: delivered to one of the principal officers of Newgate, the night before his execution on September 18, 1815, for the murder of Elizabeth Beesmore in Drury lane. Relating his horrible sufferings until compelled to surrender to public justice by the constant supernatural visitations of the murdered woman, and the frequent appearance of her apparition. From the original paper now in the possession o
Bedworth, Thomas
Bedworth, Thomas, 1764-1815 -- Trials, litigation, etc.; Beesmore, Elizabeth, -1815; Trials (Murder) -- England -- London
The facts which were adduced in evidence were not so strong, although
they in some measure confirmed the truth of the foregoing confession.
The best evidence that could be given by the few witnesses who were
examined, went to a presumption that _Bedworth_ effected the bloody deed
with a razor, and it was so stated in the indictment.—This, however, did
not prove to be true; but Mr. JUSTICE HEATH, in summing up, observed,
that this was immaterial, in point of law;—the charge implied being, that
the prisoner had done the act with a _cutting_ or _sharp_ instrument.
Throughout the trial _Bedworth_ manifested a good deal of agitation; but
this the Editor ascertains to have arisen in consequence of the evidence
of two women, who made, as he supposed, some misstatements, as to _time_,
on the day whereon the murder had been committed. Indeed, such was the
effect of these trivial inaccuracies upon his mind, that he _twice_
solemnly addressed the court, calling upon God to witness, that the women
had _forsworn_ themselves in this respect.—This conduct was _mistaken_,
_by the court_, as an attempt to deny his guilt.—But the fact was
otherwise, and the whole tenor of his conduct in prison, from the time of
his surrender, in July, as well as his confession, furnish the best
proofs to the contrary.
The trial did not last an hour, and Mr. JUSTICE HEATH having charged the
Jury, the latter almost unhesitatingly returned a verdict of—GUILTY.
The wretched man was then asked by the clerk of the peace, what he had to
offer in an arrest of judgment by the court—to die according to law.
The prisoner replied, in much agitation, “nothing beyond the false
swearing of the women.”
_The_ RECORDER _being absent_, a short explanation then took place upon
the bench, as to the passing of the sentence. Mr. JUSTICE HEATH, who
tried the prisoner, declining to perform that duty, and the COMMON
SERJEANT expressing a wish to evade the painful task, never having been
called upon to execute it. It was however, at length, settled that the
COMMON SERJEANT should pronounce the sentence of death, and, in doing so,
he addressed the prisoner to the following effect:—
“_Thomas Bedworth_,—After a painful investigation of the crime which
has been laid to your charge, a humane and impartial jury of your
country, hearing the evidence adduced against you, as well as your
own voluntary confession, have thought it their duty to find you
GUILTY of the horrid crime of MURDER!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account