Botany; Geotropism; Plants -- Irritability and movements
This difference in their behaviour seems at first
inexplicable, but can, we believe, be simply explained by the
difference between the initial power of the two forces under the above
circumstances, combined with the well-known principle of the
after-effects of a stimulus. When a young and sensitive radicle is
extended horizontally, with a square attached to the lower side of the
tip, geotropism acts on it at right angles, and, as we have seen, is
then evidently more efficient than the irritation from the square; and
the power of geotropism will be strengthened at each successive period
by its previous action—that is, by its after-effects. On the other
hand, when a square is affixed to a vertically dependent radicle, and
the apex begins to
curve upwards, this movement will be opposed by geotropism acting only
at a very oblique angle, and the irritation from the card will be
strengthened by its previous action. We may therefore conclude that the
initial power of an irritant on the apex of the radicle of the bean, is
less than that of geotropism when acting at right angles, but greater
than that of geotropism when acting obliquely on it.
Sensitiveness of the tips of the Secondary Radicles of the Bean to
contact.—All the previous observations relate to the main or primary
radicle. Some beans suspended to cork-lids, with their radicles dipping
into water, had developed secondary or lateral radicles, which were
afterwards kept in very damp air, at the proper low temperature for
full sensitiveness. They projected, as usual, almost horizontally, with
only a slight downward curvature, and retained this position during
several days. Sachs has shown[4] that these secondary roots are acted
on in a peculiar manner by geotropism, so that if displaced they
reassume their former sub-horizontal position, and do not bend
vertically downwards like the primary radicle. Minute squares of the
stiff sanded paper were affixed by means of shellac (but in some
instances with thick gum-water) to the tips of 39 secondary radicles of
different ages, generally the uppermost ones. Most of the squares were
fixed to the lower sides of the apex, so that if they acted the radicle
would bend upwards; but some were fixed laterally, and a few on the
upper side. Owing to the extreme tenuity of these radicles, it was very
difficult to attach the square to the actual apex. Whether owing to
this or some other circumstance, only nine of the squares induced any
curvature. The curvature amounted in some cases to about 45° above the
horizon, in others to 90°, and then the tip pointed to the zenith. In
one instance a distinct upward curvature was observed in 8 h. 15 m.,
but usually not until 24 h. had elapsed. Although only 9 out of 39
radicles were affected, yet the curvature was so distinct in several of
them, that there could be no doubt that the tip is sensitive to slight
contact, and that the growing part bends away from the touching object.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account