Until recently the cause of all such bending movements was believed to be due to the increased growth of the side which becomes for a time convex; that this side does temporarily grow more quickly than the concave side has been well established; but De Vries has lately shown that such increased growth follows a previously increased state of turgescence on the convex side.[1] In the case of parts provided with a so-called joint, cushion or pulvinus, which consists of an aggregate of small cells that have ceased to increase in size from a very early age, we meet with similar movements; and here, as Pfeffer has shown[2] and as we shall see in the course of this work, the increased turgescence of the cells on opposite sides is not followed by increased growth. Wiesner denies in certain cases the accuracy of De Vries’ conclusion about turgescence, and maintains[3] that the increased extensibility of the cell-walls is the more important element. That such extensibility must accompany increased turgescence in order that the part may bend is manifest, and this has been insisted on by several botanists; but in the case of unicellular plants it can hardly fail to be the more important element. On the whole we may at present conclude that increased growth, first on one side and then on another, is a secondary effect, and that the increased turgescence of the cells, together with the extensibility of their walls, is the primary cause of the movement of circumnutation.[4] [1] Sachs first showed (‘Lehrbuch,’ etc., 4th edit. p. 452) the intimate connection between turgescence and growth. For De Vries’ interesting essay, ‘Wachsthumskrümmungen mehrzelliger Organe,’ see ‘Bot. Zeitung,’ Dec. 19, 1879, p. 830. [2] ‘Die Periodischen Bewegungen der Blattorgane,’ 1875. [3] ‘Untersuchungen über den Heliotropismus,’ Sitzb. der K. Akad. der Wissenschaft. (Vienna), Jan. 1880. [4] See Mr. Vines’ excellent discussion (‘Arbeiten des Bot. Instituts in Würzburg,’ B. II. pp. 142, 143, 1878) on this intricate subject. Hofmeister’s observations (‘Jahreschrifte des Vereins für Vaterl. Naturkunde in Würtemberg,’ 1874, p. 211) on the curious movements of Spirogyra, a plant consisting of a single row of cells, are valuable in relation to this subject.