The Power of the Popes: An Historical Essay on Their Temporal Dominion, and the Abuse of Their Spiritual AuthorityDaunou, P. C. F. (Pierre Claude François)
History
The Power of the Popes: An Historical Essay on Their Temporal Dominion, and the Abuse of Their Spiritual Authority
Daunou, P. C. F. (Pierre Claude François)
Papacy -- History; Popes -- Temporal power
He declares to Charles the Bald,⁹¹ that Theutberga having had recourse
to the church, she could no longer be subject to a secular tribunal. In
another letter to the same monarch,⁹² he announces that he writes no
longer to Lothaire because he has excommunicated him. Lothaire, indeed,
though he had taken back Theutberga, had not altogether relinquished
Valdrade; and Nicholas would not be satisfied with a shew of compliance.
⁸⁹ Coll. Histories of France, vol. 8, p. 419.
⁹⁰ Ibid, p. 428.
⁹¹ Ibid, p. 422.
⁹² Ibid, p. 438.
Theutberga, finally, wearied with these contests, designed renouncing
for ever the titles of wife and of queen:—the pontiff would not permit
it; he addressed her in a long epistle, in which he recommended to her
perseverance and intrepidity, and directed her rather to die than to
yield.⁹³
The same principles relative to the jurisdiction and independence of the
clergy, are to be found in ‘Nicholas’s Rescript to the Bulgarians:’⁹⁴
“You who
“are laymen,” says he to them,
“ought not to
“judge either priest or clerk: they must be left to
“the judgment of their prelates.”
Thus, while the pope censures the conduct of kings, annuls or confirms
their civil acts, and even disposes of their crowns, the members of the
clerical body, to the lowest degree, are freed from all secular
jurisdiction. Such is the _regime_ to which Nicholas wished to subject
the East and the West. He especially had at heart to make Constantinople
submit; and his first step was to condemn and depose the patriarch
Photius, in defiance of the emperor Michael. He threatened to burn, in
the face of the world, an energetic letter which this emperor had
written him, to excommunicate the ministers who had advised him to this
step, and to annul in a Western council whatever had been done for
Photius in the East This quarrel, winch was prolonged under the
successors of Nicholas, was the prelude to the schism of the Greek
Church.
⁹³ Concilior, vol. 8, p. 425.
⁹⁴ Henry’s Eccles. Hist -b. 60. n. 61.
Basilius Cephalas, or the Macedonian, assassinated his benefactor
Michael, and seized upon the throne of Constantinople. Photius, on this
occasion, was willing to imitate St. Ambrose, and ventured to address
Basilius:
“Your hands are polluted with.
“blood: approach not the sacred mysteries.”
But Basilius did not in any respect imitate Theodosius: he banished
Photius, and re-established Ignatius, whom Michael had, not less
unjustly, driven from, the patriarchal chair. Adrian II. took advantage
from the disgrace of Photius to renew against him the anathemas of
Nicholas. Photius, condemned already at Rome, was also condemned in a
general council held at Constantinople.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account