The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomyDick, Thomas
Science
The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomy
Dick, Thomas
Astronomical instruments; Astronomy; Telescopes
It is evident, then, that all the various assemblages of colours which
we see in the objects around us, _are not in the bodies themselves_,
but in the light which falls upon them. There is no colour _inherent_
in the grass, the trees, the fruits, and the flowers, nor even in the
most splendid and variegated dress that adorns a lady. All such objects
are as destitute of colour, in themselves, as bodies which are placed
in the centre of the earth, or as the chaotic materials out of which
our globe was formed, before light was created. For where there is no
light, there is no colour. Every object is black, or without colour,
in the dark, and it only appears coloured as soon as light renders it
visible. This is further evident from the following experiment. If we
place a coloured body in one of the colours of the spectrum which is
formed by the prism, it appears of the colour of the rays in which it
is placed. Take, for example, a red rose, and expose it first to the
red rays, and it will appear of a more brilliant ruddy hue. Hold it
in the blue rays, and it appears no longer red, but of a dingy blue
colour, and in like manner its colour will appear different, when
placed in all the other differently coloured rays. This is the reason
why the colours of objects are essentially altered by the nature of
the light in which they are seen. The colours of ribbons and various
pieces of silk or woollen stuff are not the same when viewed by
candle-light as in the day time. In the light of a candle or a lamp,
blue often appears green, and yellow objects assume a whitish aspect.
The reason is that the light of a candle is not so pure a white as that
of the sun, but has a yellowish tinge, and therefore, when refracted
by the prism, the yellowish rays are found to predominate, and the
superabundance of yellow rays gives to blue objects a greenish hue.
The doctrine we are now illustrating is one which a great many persons,
especially among the fair sex, find it difficult to admit. They cannot
conceive it possible that there is no colour really inherent in their
splendid attire, and no tints of beauty in their countenances. ‘What,’
said a certain lady, ‘are there no colours in my shawl, and in the
ribbons that adorn my head-dress--and, are we all as black as negroes
in the dark; I should almost shudder to think of it.’ Such persons,
however, need be in no alarm at the idea; but may console themselves
with the reflection, that, when they are stripped of all their coloured
ornaments in the dark, they are certain that _they will never be seen
by any one_ in that state; and therefore, there is no reason to regret
the temporary loss of those beauties which light creates--when they
themselves and all surrounding objects are _invisible_. But, to give
a still more palpable proof of this position, the following popular
experiments may be stated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account