The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomyDick, Thomas
Science
The Practical Astronomer: Comprising illustrations of light and colours--practical descriptions of all kinds of telescopes--the use of the equatorial-transit--circular, and other astronomical instruments, a particular account of the Earl of Rosse's large telescopes, and other topics connected with astronomy
Dick, Thomas
Astronomical instruments; Astronomy; Telescopes
From the experiments I have made in reference to these instruments, it
is demonstrable, that _a tube is not necessary_ in the construction of
a reflecting telescope--at least on the principle now stated--whether
it be used by day or by night for terrestrial or celestial objects;
for I have frequently used these telescopes in the open air in the day
time, without any inconvenience from extraneous light. Therefore, were
a reflecting telescope of 50 or 60 feet in length to be constructed, it
might be fitted up at a comparatively small expence, after the expense
of the metallic substances, and of casting, grinding, and polishing
the speculum is defrayed. The largest instrument of this description
which has hitherto been constructed is the 40 feet reflector of Sir
W. Herschel. This complicated and most unwieldy instrument had a tube
of rolled or sheet iron 39 feet 4 inches in length, about 15 feet in
circumference, and weighed about 8000 pounds. Now, I conceive that
such enormous tubes, in instruments of such dimensions, are altogether
unnecessary. Nothing more is requisite than a short tube for holding
the speculum. Connected with one side of this tube (or with both sides
were it found necessary), two strong bars of wood, projecting a few
feet beyond the speculum end, and extending in front as far as the
focal length of the mirror, and connected by cross bars of wood, iron
or brass--would be quite sufficient for a support to the eye-piece, and
for directing the motion of the instrument. A telescope of 40 or 50
feet in length, constructed on this plan, would not require one fifth
of the expense, nor one fourth of the apparatus and mechanical power
for moving it to any required position, which were found necessary
in the construction of Sir W. Herschel’s large reflecting telescope.
The idea here suggested will perhaps be more readily appreciated by
an inspection of fig. 71, where A is the short tube, BC and DE the
two large bars or arms, connected with cross bars, for the purpose of
securing strength and steadiness. At I and K, behind the speculum,
weights might be applied, if necessary, for counterbalancing the lever
power of the long arm. F represents the position of the eye-piece,
and GH the joint and part of the pedestal on which the instrument is
placed. With regard to telescopes of smaller dimensions, as from 5
to 15 feet in focal length--with the exception of the expense of the
specula and eye-pieces--they might be fitted up for a sum not greater
than from 3 to 10 or 15 guineas.
[Illustration: _figure 71._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive