All schools recognize the wonderful recuperative power of nature, as this from the introduction of a standard allopathic text book will show[9]: “There is no scientific dogma better established than this: that the living organism is in itself adequate to the cure of all its curable disorders. This natural law sustains the medical skeptic in his infidelity, enables the homeopath to report his sugar cures, and helps all physicians out of more close places than they are generally willing to acknowledge.” But at times, as all will agree, nature is not able to overcome its maladies and assistance is needed. Here, again, is a divergence as to the method and character of that assistance. There is no system so trivial or absurd which cannot point to its cures, but a school of medicine should have a settled system with established methods of procedure. This is not true of any school employing drugs as its principal therapy. In the President’s annual address at Cleveland he says[10]: “The observant reader of the progressive medical press is struck at once by the unsettled condition in the field of modern therapeutics. The trend is emphatically away from drugs. But, in the effort to get away from medicine, the medical investigator has wandered far afield, cutting loose from nature and resorting to the artificial.” It is the last paragraph of the extract quoted which particularly emphasizes the point of divergence, natural _versus_ unnatural methods. It must be understood at once that the osteopath admits the reality of drug action for “there is no doubt that the pharmacopeia records many drugs whose action is rapid and effective so far as securing activity or decrease of secretion is concerned, but the element of danger, i. e., their destructive power is great. Oftentimes their power does not stop at the point desired or limit its effect to the therapeutic action sought[11].” This point of unreliability of the drug is emphasized by the following from recognized medical authority[12]: “We give drugs for two purposes: (1) To restore health directly by removing the sum of the conditions which constitute disease. Here we act empirically with no definite knowledge—often indeed with little idea of the action of our drugs, but on the ground that in our hands or in the hands of others they have restored health in like cases. (2) To influence one or more of the several tissues and organs which are in an abnormal state so as to restore them to or toward the normal; with the hope that if we succeed in our purpose recovery will take place. The purpose we effect by means of the influence which the chemical properties or drugs exert on the structure and function of the several tissues and organs. Minute information, therefore, of the nature of drugs and their action is essential for their proper employment.” Osteopathy brings into action the latent or stagnant forces of nature by specific methods which are usually reliable.