“Somatic Reflexes”
“In the first series of experiments, the electrodes were placed upon
the nasal mucous membrane of animals under anesthesia. The muscles near
the third thoracic vertebra were at once strongly contracted....
“The electrodes were then placed upon the conjunctivæ. The muscles near
the second vertebra were then contracted. There were also slight and
inconstant contractions of the cervical muscles....
“The electrodes were placed upon the eye ball. The muscular
contractions were sometimes noted near the second thoracic vertebra,
but the reaction was not constant. The cervical muscles were scarcely
contracted at all.
“The electrodes were placed upon the outer surface of the eye lids.
The facial muscles were contracted very quickly and forcibly, but no
contraction of the muscles of the upper dorsal region were noted....
“The =superior cervical ganglion= was exposed to view, and the
electrodes placed upon it. The pupils became greatly dilated, the
conjunctivæ became lighter in color, and the mucous membranes of the
nose and throat were also lightened....
“The =Gasserian ganglion= was exposed to view. The ganglion was
stimulated directly. The upper thoracic muscles were very strongly
contracted, and the blood vessels in the area of the distribution of
the fifth nerve were immediately and strongly contracted. Some of the
sympathetic fibers are carried by way of the fifth nerve. In order to
exclude the effect of the direct stimulation of these fibers, the fifth
nerve was cut, and the central end was stimulated by the electrodes.
The muscles of the upper thoracic region were contracted, as before.
The vessels in the area of distribution of the fifth nerve were
contracted after latent period of a minute or so....
“The stimulation of the central end of the cut fifth nerve caused
strong muscular contractions in the upper thoracic region, and also
constriction of the vessels in the area of distribution of the fifth.
Direct stimulation of the superior cervical ganglion produced effects
identical with those produced before the mutilation.
“The spinal cord was cut above and below the superior cervical
ganglion. This cut was made from behind, and the sympathetic chain was
uninjured. The effects noted after both operations were the same, and
can be described as one.
“The stimulation of any cranial structure failed to cause reflex
contraction of the muscles in the upper dorsal or the cervical region.
“Stimulation of the cranial structures did not produce any vascular
changes except those which might be referred to the direct effects of
the electricity upon the vessel walls.
“Direct stimulation of the =superior cervical ganglion= produced the
effects noted before mutilation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account