The Practitioner. May, 1869.: A Monthly Journal of Therapeutics — John Shaqi
The Practitioner. May, 1869.: A Monthly Journal of TherapeuticsVarious
Science
The Practitioner. May, 1869.: A Monthly Journal of Therapeutics
Various
Medicine -- Periodicals; Therapeutics -- Periodicals
On June 21, he inhaled 4 pints mixed with 30 of air, and felt a “greater
lightness”—no increase of palpitation. After four days of treatment, he
got an opportunity of spending a fortnight in the Highlands, and I
recommended him to try the breathing of oxygen there. He returned home,
however, in July, not so much improved as we had hoped, and still
complaining much of soreness about the chest, and oppressed breathing.
From this time to September he took an inhalation every third or fourth
day, and with perceptible benefit. It is true that he took, for some
weeks of the time, the hypophosphate of lime and cod oil, but still the
effect of the inhalation in improving breathing power, and appetite
especially, was immediate enough to convince us that it had a large
share in his recovery. He has remained fairly well since.
To resume: 12 cases are here related; 2 of the 12 are of organic, and in
all probability incurable disease, and these 2 derived little or no
benefit from the inhalation of oxygen; the other 10 found benefit as
recorded, some more, some less, but all of a kind which I have not seen
given by medicine alone. It remains to ask—Is there any common character
by which we may connect together this series of cases, and which may
enable us to say, oxygen is good for such and such a class of cases, as
we say iodide of potassium or quinine is good for such and such a class?
I think that we may find some such common character in the presence of
congestion, especially venous congestion, whether of the liver, the
lungs, or the uterus: more than this I will not say at present; the
classification of carefully-observed cases, and a rational theory of
this “modus medendi,” are points that require special study, and cannot
be dogmatised upon until we have a wider basis of facts.
ON THE HERPETIC FORM OF STRUMOUS OPHTHALMIA, AND ITS TREATMENT BY
ARSENIC.
BY ROBERT S. OGLESBY,
_Assistant Demonstrator of Anatomy in the Leeds School of Medicine._
Strumous Ophthalmia, associated with herpes of the face, or as it may be
termed the herpetic form of strumous ophthalmia, is a disease so often
met with in general practice, and one so little amenable to local
treatment, that I venture to say a few words regarding its treatment
constitutionally. I should hesitate to occupy valuable time and space
with what appears to be a trivial subject, on which much has already
been written, did I not believe that by so doing additional light might
be thrown upon the subject. For several years past I have been
collecting evidence, carefully sifting and placing all well-marked cases
aside for special treatment. The results obtained in the earlier batches
of cases thus treated, decided me to continue such treatment for a
lengthened period. The evidence thus obtained being highly satisfactory,
other treatment formerly employed was abandoned.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account