The Prehistoric World; Or, Vanished RacesAllen, Emory Adams
History
The Prehistoric World; Or, Vanished Races
Allen, Emory Adams
Archaeology; Indians; Prehistoric peoples
We have seen that they can be traced over wide-extended areas.
They seem to have invaded Europe, along with the great invasion
of animals from Asia, constituting the temperate group of
animals; and with those animals they probably shifted back and
forth, as the cold of the Glacial Age increased or waned. These
people seem to have completely vanished. At a later date, when
the cold of the Glacial Age was once more severe, associated with
animals now living only in high northern latitudes, came the
Cave-men, whose discussion has formed the subject of this
chapter.
It will be seen how much we owe to patient investigators. The
results are, indeed, bewildering. They make us acquainted with a
people the very existence of whom was not known a few years back.
Though the whole life of those ancient races seemed hopelessly
lost in the night of time, the gloom is irradiated by the light
of modern science, which lays before our astonished vision the
remains of arts and industries of the primitive tribes that
occupied Europe during the morning-time of human life.
The Mammoth. REFERENCES
The manuscript of this chapter was submitted to Prof. B. B.
Wright, of Overlain, for criticism.
On the formation of caves consult Geikie’s “Prehistoric
Europe,” p. 71; also Evans’s “Ancient Stone Implements,” p.
429.
Evans’s “Ancient Stone Implements,” p. 445.
Pronounced Bret’-chá, a rock composed of fragments of older
rock, united by a cement.
Geikie’s “Prehistoric Europe,” p. 92.
Pengelly, quoted by Geikie, “Prehistoric Europe,” p. 93.
Evans’s “Ancient Stone Implements,” p. 462.
Evans’s “Ancient Stone Implement,” p. 463.
Geikie’s “Prehistoric Europe,” p. 102.
Mr. Dawkins (“Early Man in Britain,” p. 203) does not consider
M. Dupont justified in dividing the remains found in the
caverns of Belgium into two epochs. He considers them to be the
remains of the same people, some tribes being, perhaps, farther
advanced than others. Mr. Dawkins is, of course, high
authority, but we think his argument could also be applied to
prove there was no real difference between the men of the River
Drift and the so-called Cave-men. This, in fact, is the opinion
of many, including Mr. Evans, who is exceptionally well
qualified to judge of these remains. We think, however, in view
of the evidence adduced by Mr. Pengelly, Mr. Geikie, Mr.
Dawkins, and others, few will venture to doubt that there is a
wide difference between the men of the River Drift and those of
the Caves.
“Prehistoric Times,” p. 330.
“Early Man in Britain,” p. 198.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account