French writers make four divisions of these caves, according to the degree of finish, which the specimens show. Mr. Dawkins does not think the difference in the implements sufficient to justify this view. With the possible exception of Le Moustier, as stated above, we think his view correct, which is also the opinion of Mr. Evans. (“Ancient Stone Implements,” p. 439.) Rau’s “Early Man in Europe,” p. 88. Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” p. 205. Ibid., p. It is, however, thought that the station was used as a camping-ground by very different people, at widely different times. Lubbock’s “Prehistoric Times,” p. 434. “Prehistoric Times,” p. 335. Morgan’s “Ancient Society,” p. 12. Lubbock’s “Prehistoric Times,” p. 338. J. C. Southall, in his valuable work, “Recent Origin of Man,” p. 195, _et seq.,_ argues that pottery was known at this time, and cites instances where it is stated to have been found. This is the opinion of Figuier also. (“Primitive Man,” p. 54.) But Mr. Dawkins points out that these pieces of pottery are clearly of a Neolithic style, and does not think it proven that they are of Paleolithic age. Mr. Geikie also denies that there is any proof that they were acquainted with the potter’s art. (“Prehistoric Europe,” p. 18.) So the highest place in the scale of civilization we can assign these people to is that of Upper Savageism. Rau’s “Early Man in Europe,” p. 79; Geikie’s “Prehistoric Europe,” p. 22. Figuier’s “Primitive Man,” p. 90. Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” p. 210. “Prehistoric Times,” p. 341. Figuier’s “Primitive Man,” p. 105. Figuier’s “Primitive Man,” p. 111. Figuier’s “Primitive Man,” p. 105. Figuier’s “Primitive Man,” p. 102. Rau’s “Early Man in Europe,” p. 73. “Prehistoric Europe,” p. 18. Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” p. 237. Figuier’s “Primitive Man,” p. 117. Ibid., p. 118. Ibid., pp. 94 and 95. This, as Sir John Lubbock points out, depends on our meaning of the word “religion.” (“Prehistoric Times,” p. 589.) “The principal instance are Cro-Magnon, Frontal, and Furforz, in Belgium; Aurignac, Bruniquel, and Mentone, in France.” “Cave-Hunting,” chap. vii. “Contributions to N. A. Ethnology,” vol. i, p. 102; “U.S. Geographical Survey West of the 100th Meridian,” vol. vii, p. 12; Abbott’s “Primitive Industry,” p. 517. “Primitive Industry,” 518. Quoted by Lubbock,”Prehistoric Times,” p. 507. Dawkins’s “Early Man in Britain,” p. 242. Prof. Grant Allen, _Popular Science Monthly,_ November, 1882, p. 99. Chapter V ANTIQUITY OF THE PALEOLITHIC AGE.1