The Press-Gang Afloat and AshoreHutchinson, J. R. (John Robert)
History
The Press-Gang Afloat and Ashore
Hutchinson, J. R. (John Robert)
Great Britain -- History, Naval; Impressment
Admiralty protections were issued under the hand of the Lord High
Admiral; ordinary protections, by departments and persons who possessed
either delegated or vested powers of issue. Thus each Trinity House
protected its own pilots; the Customs protected whale fishermen and
apprentices to the sea; impress officers protected seamen temporarily
lent to ships in lieu of men taken out of them by the gangs. Some
protections were issued for a limited period and lapsed when that period
expired; others were of perpetual "force," unless invalidated by some
irregular acton the part of the holder. No protection was good unless
it bore a minute description of the person to whom it applied, and all
protections had to be carried on the person and produced upon demand.
Thomas Moverty was pressed out of a wherry in the Thames owing to his
having changed his clothes and left his protection at home; and
John Scott of Mistley, in Suffolk, was taken whilst working in his
shirtsleeves, though his protection lay in the pocket of his jacket,
only a few yards away. [Footnote: _Admiralty Records_ 1. 1479--Capt.
Bridges, 11 August 1743. _Admiralty Records_ 1. 1531--Capt. Ballard, 15
March 1804, and enclosure.]
The most trifling irregularity in the protection itself, or the
slightest discrepancy between the personal appearance of the bearer and
the written description of him, was enough to convert the protection
into so much waste paper and the bearer into a naval seaman.
North-country apprentices, whose indentures bore a 14s. stamp in
accordance with Scottish law, were pressed because that document did not
bear a 15s. stamp according to English law. A seaman was in one instance
described in his protection as "smooth-faced," that is, beardless. The
impress officer scrutinised him closely. "Aha!" said he, "you are not
smooth-faced. You are pockmarked"; and he pressed the poor fellow for
that reason.
To be over-protected was as bad as having no protection at all.
Thomas Letting, a collier's man, and John Anthony of the merchant ship
_Providence_, learnt this fact to their cost when they were taken out
of their respective ships for having each two protections. In short,
the slightest pretext served. If a protection had but a few more days to
run; if the name, date, place or other essential particular showed
signs of "coaxing," that is, of having been "on purpose rubbed out" or
altered; if a man's description did not figure in his protection, or
if it figured on the back instead of in the margin, or in the margin
instead of on the back; if his face wore a ruddy rather than a pale
look, if his hair were red when it ought to have been brown, if he
proved to be "tall and remarkable thin" when he should have been
middle-sized and thick-set--in any of these, as in a hundred and one
similar cases, the bearer of the protection paid the penalty for what
the impress officer regarded as a "hoodwinking attempt" to cheat the
King's service of an eligible man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account