Jefferson did not collect all he earned; in fact, he began public
life well-to-do for a man of that period, and died poor--impoverished
by visits of those who called to tell him how much they loved him and
how much they appreciated his work. Lincoln did not collect the full
amount; neither Jefferson nor Lincoln would have cared to collect
five hundred million. What would either one have done with such a
sum? Or, what is more important, what would five hundred million of
dollars have done with Jefferson or Lincoln?
In that wonderful parable of the sower, Christ speaks of the seeds that
fell and of the thorns that sprang up and choked them, and He himself
explained what he meant by this illustration, namely: That the cares of
this world and the deceitfulness of riches choke the truth. If the great
benefactors of the race had been burdened with the care of big fortunes,
they could not have devoted themselves to the nobler things that gave
them a place in the affection of their people and in history.
It seems, therefore, that while one can not rightfully collect more
than he honestly earns, he may earn more than it would be wise for
him to collect. And that brings us to the next question: How much
should one desire to collect from society? I answer, that no matter
how large a service he may render or how much he may earn, one should
not desire to collect more than he can wisely spend.
And how much can one wisely spend? Not as much as you might think,
and not nearly as much as some have tried to spend. No matter how
honestly money may be acquired, one is not free to spend it at will.
We are hedged about by certain restrictions that we can neither
remove nor ignore. God has written certain laws in our nature--laws
that no legislature can repeal--laws that no court can declare
unconstitutional, and these laws limit us in our expenditures.
Let us consider some of the things for which we can properly spend
money. We need food--we all need food, and we need about the same
amount; not exactly, but the difference in quantity is not great.
The range in expenditure is greater than the range in quantity, for
expenditure covers kind and quality as well as quantity. But there is
a limit even to expenditure. If a man eats too much he suffers for
it. If he squanders his money on high-priced foods, he wears his
stomach out. There is an old saying which we have all heard, that
"The poor man is looking for food for his stomach, while the rich man
is going from one watering place to another looking for a stomach for
his food." This is only a witty way of expressing the sober truth,
namely, that one is limited in the amount of money he can wisely
spend for food.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account