London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
He came in to see Miss Pynsent about midnight; as soon as she heard the
lame tinkle of the bell she went to the door to let him in. He was an
original, in the fullest sense of the word: a lonely, disappointed,
embittered, cynical little man, whose musical organisation had been
sterile, who had the nerves, the sensibilities, of a gentleman, and
whose fate had condemned him, for the last ten years, to play a fiddle
at a second-rate theatre for a few shillings a week. He had ideas of
his own about everything, and they were not always very improving. For
Amanda Pynsent he represented art, literature (the literature of the
play-bill) and philosophy, and she always felt about him as if he
belonged to a higher social sphere, though his earnings were hardly
greater than her own and he lived in a single back-room, in a house
where she had never seen a window washed. He had, for her, the glamour
of reduced gentility and fallen fortunes; she was conscious that he
spoke a different language (though she couldn’t have said in what the
difference consisted) from the other members of her humble, almost
suburban circle; and the shape of his hands was distinctly
aristocratic. (Miss Pynsent, as I have intimated, was immensely
preoccupied with that element in life.) Mr Vetch displeased her only by
one of the facets of his character—his blasphemous republican, radical
views, and the contemptuous manner in which he expressed himself about
the nobility. On that ground he worried her extremely, though he never
seemed to her so clever as when he horrified her most. These dreadful
theories (expressed so brilliantly that, really, they might have been
dangerous if Miss Pynsent had not known her own place so well)
constituted no presumption against his refined origin; they were
explained, rather, to a certain extent, by a just resentment at finding
himself excluded from his proper place. Mr Vetch was short, fat and
bald, though he was not much older than Miss Pynsent, who was not much
older than some people who called themselves forty-five; he always went
to the theatre in evening-dress, with a flower in his button-hole, and
wore a glass in one eye. He looked placid and genial, and as if he
would fidget at the most about the ‘get up’ of his linen; you would
have thought him finical but superficial, and never have suspected that
he was a revolutionist, or even a critic of life. Sometimes, when he
could get away from the theatre early enough, he went with a pianist, a
friend of his, to play dance-music at small parties; and after such
expeditions he was particularly cynical and startling; he indulged in
diatribes against the British middle-class, its Philistinism, its
snobbery. He seldom had much conversation with Miss Pynsent without
telling her that she had the intellectual outlook of a caterpillar; but
this was his privilege after a friendship now of seven years’ standing,
which had begun (the year after he came to live in Lomax Place) with
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account