London (England) -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
almost detached, in Putney, with a wife known to have secret
aspirations toward a page in buttons? Above all, was Mr Vetch, who
earned a weekly wage, and not a large one, with his fiddle, but who had
mysterious affinities of another sort, reminiscences of a phase in
which he smoked cigars, had a hat-box and used cabs—besides visiting
Boulogne? Anastasius Vetch had interfered in his life, atrociously, in
a terrible crisis; but Hyacinth, who strove to cultivate justice in his
own conduct, believed he had acted conscientiously and tried to esteem
him, the more so as the fiddler evidently felt that he had something to
make up to him and had treated him with marked benevolence for years.
He believed, in short, that Mr Vetch took a sincere interest in him,
and if he should meddle again would meddle in a different way: he used
to see him sometimes looking at him with the kindest eyes. It would
make a difference, therefore, whether he were of the people or not,
inasmuch as in the day of the great revenge it would only be the people
who should be saved. It was for the people the world was made: whoever
was not of them was against them; and all others were cumberers,
usurpers, exploiters, _accapareurs_, as M. Poupin used to say. Hyacinth
had once put the question directly to Mr Vetch, who looked at him a
while through the fumes of his eternal pipe and then said, “Do you
think I’m an aristocrat?”
“I didn’t know but you were a _bourgeois_,” the young man answered.
“No, I’m neither. I’m a Bohemian.”
“With your evening dress, every night?”
“My dear boy,” said the fiddler, “those are the most confirmed.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account