The Principles of Biology, Volume 2 (of 2) — John Shaqi
The Principles of Biology, Volume 2 (of 2)Spencer, Herbert
Science
The Principles of Biology, Volume 2 (of 2)
Spencer, Herbert
Biology
Wolff established, and Goethe further illustrated, another general law
of structure in flowering plants. Each leaf commonly contains in its
axil a bud, similar in structure to the terminal bud. This axillary bud
may remain undeveloped; or it may develop into a lateral shoot like
the main shoot; or it may develop into a flower. If a shoot bearing
lateral flowers be examined, it will be found that the internode, or
space which separates each leaf with its axillary flower from the leaf
and axillary flower above it, becomes gradually less towards the upper
end of the shoot. In some plants, as in the fox-glove, the internodes
constitute a regularly-diminishing series. In other plants, the series
they form suddenly begins to diminish so rapidly, as to bring the
flowers into a short spike: instance the common orchis. And again, by
still more sudden dwarfing of the internodes, the flowers are brought
into a cluster; as they are in the cowslip. On contemplating a clover
flower, in which this clustering has been carried so far as to produce
a compact head; and on considering what must happen if, by a further
arrest of axial development, the foot-stalks of the florets disappear;
it will be seen that there must result a crowd of flowers, seated
close together on the end of the axis. And if, at the same time, the
internodes of the upper stem-leaves also remain undeveloped, these
stem-leaves will be grouped into a common involucre: we shall have
a composite flower, such as the thistle. Hence, to modifications in
the developments of foliar organs, have to be added modifications in
the developments of axial organs. Comparisons disclose the gradations
through which axes, like their appendages, pass into all varieties
of size, proportion, and structure. And we learn that the occurrence
of these two kinds of metamorphosis, in all conceivable degrees
and combinations, furnishes us with a proximate interpretation of
morphological composition in Phænogams.
I say a proximate interpretation, because there remain to be solved
certain deeper problems; one of which at once presents itself to be
dealt with under the present head. Leaves, petals, stamens, &c., being
shown to be homologous foliar organs; and the part to which they are
attached, proving to be an indefinitely-extended axis of growth, or
axial organ; we are met by the questions,--What is a foliar organ? and
What is an axial organ? The morphological composition of a Phænogam is
undetermined, so long as we cannot say to what lower structures leaves
and shoots are homologous; and how this integration of them originates.
To these questions let us now address ourselves.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account