The Principles of Chemistry, Volume IMendeleyev, Dmitry Ivanovich
Science
The Principles of Chemistry, Volume I
Mendeleyev, Dmitry Ivanovich
Argon; Chemistry; Periodic law
of 3,000 atmospheres (this pressure is attained in guns) it
would, if it followed Mariotte's law, weigh 4·2 grams--that is,
would be about four times heavier than water--and at a pressure
of 10,000 atmospheres it would be heavier than mercury. Besides
this, positive discrepancies are probable because the molecules
of a gas themselves must occupy a certain volume. Considering
that Mariotte's law, strictly speaking, applies only to the
intermolecular space, we can understand the necessity of positive
discrepancies. If we designate the volume of the molecules of a
gas by _b_ (like van der Waals, _see_ Chap. I., Note 34), then it
must be expected that _p(v-b) = C_. Hence _pv = C + bp_, which
expresses a positive discrepancy. Supposing that for hydrogen
_pv_ = 1,000, at a pressure of one metre of mercury, according to
the results of Regnault's, Amagat's, and Natterer's experiments,
we obtain _b_ as approximately 0·7 to 0·9.
Thus the increase of _pv_ with the increase of pressure must
be considered as the normal law of the compressibility of
gases. Hydrogen presents such a positive compressibility at
all pressures, for it presents positive discrepancies from
Mariotte's law, according to Regnault, at all pressures above the
atmospheric pressure. Hence hydrogen is, so to say, a perfect
gas. No other gas behaves so simply with a change of pressure.
All other gases at pressures from 1 to 30 atmospheres present
negative discrepancies--that is, they are then compressed to a
greater degree than should follow from Mariotte's law, as was
shown by the determinations of Regnault, which were verified
when repeated by myself and Boguzsky. Thus, for example, on
changing the pressure from 4 to 20 metres of mercury--that is,
on increasing the pressure five times--the volume only decreased
4·93 times when hydrogen was taken, and 5·06 when air was taken.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account