The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of DickensNicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
General
The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of Dickens
Nicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
Mr. Forster was devotedly attached to my father, but as years passed
by this engrossing friendship made him a little jealous of his
confidence, and more than a little exacting in his demands upon it.
My father was perfectly aware of this weakness in his friend, and
although the knowledge of it made him smile at times, and even joke
about it when we were at home and alone, he was always singularly
tenderhearted where Mr. Forster was concerned, and was particularly
careful never to wound the very sensitive nature of one who, from the
first moment of their acquaintance, had devoted his time and energy
to making my father’s path in life as smooth as so intricate a path
could be made. In all business transactions Mr. Forster acted for
him, and generally brought him through these troubles triumphantly,
whereas, if left to himself, his impetuosity and impatience might
have spoilt all chances of success; while in all his private troubles
my father instinctively turned to his friend, and even when not
invariably following his advice, had yet so much confidence in his
judgment as to be rendered not only uneasy but unhappy if Mr. Forster
did not approve of the decision at which he ultimately arrived. From
the beginning of their friendship to the end of my father’s life the
relations between the two friends remained unchanged; and the notion
that has been spread abroad that my father wilfully misled Mr.
Forster in what he told him of the plot of _Edwin Drood_ should be
abandoned, as it does not correspond with the knowledge of those who
understood the dignity of my father’s character, and were also aware
of the perfectly frank terms upon which he lived with Mr. Forster.
If my father again changed his plan for the story of _Edwin Drood_
the first thing he would naturally do would be to write to Mr.
Forster and inform him of the alteration. We might imagine for an
instant that he would perhaps desire to keep the change as a surprise
for his friend, but what I have just stated with regard to Mr.
Forster’s character renders this supposition out of the question, as
my father knew for a certainty that his jealousy would debar him from
appreciating such a surprise, and that he would in all probability
strongly resent what he might with justice be allowed to consider as
a piece of unnecessary caution on my father’s part. That he did not
write to Mr. Forster to tell him of any divergence from his second
plan for the book we all know, and we know also that my eldest
brother, Charles, positively declared that he had heard from his
father’s lips that Edwin Drood was dead. Here, therefore, are two
very important witnesses to a fact that is still doubted by those who
never met my father, and were never impressed by the grave sincerity
with which he would have given this assurance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account