The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of DickensNicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
General
The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of Dickens
Nicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
Sir Walter Scott in his _Journal_ for 7th March 1828 tells us that when
she returned to her party in the character of an old Scottish lady she
deceived every one. ‘The prosing account she gave of her son, the
antiquary, who found an auld wig in a slate quarry, was extremely
ludicrous, and she puzzled the Professor of Agriculture with a merciless
account of the succession of crops in the parks around her old
mansion-house. No person to whom the secret was not entrusted had the
least guess of an impostor, _except one shrewd young lady present_, _who
observed the hand narrowly_, _and saw it was plumper than the age of the
lady seemed to warrant_.’
In the _Daily Mail_ of 4th April 1912 there is an account of two girls
who lived together, passing as husband and wife. The man with whom they
lodged said: ‘The husband’s hands were so small and soft that both my
wife and myself were suspicious.’
I ask the attention of readers to the manner in which Dickens refers to
Datchery’s hands. I do not lay too much stress on these indications, but
they deserve consideration.
1. We read in chapter xviii. about Datchery in the coffee-room of the
Crozier, ‘as he stood with his back to the empty fireplace waiting for
his fried sole, veal cutlet, and pint of sherry.’ (‘Empty’ was an
afterthought on Dickens’s part.) Here we have Datchery keeping his hands
out of view.
2. A little after, Datchery asks the waiter to take his hat down for a
moment from the peg. If he had stretched out his own hand it might have
been noticed.
3. Later in the same chapter, when Datchery meets Jasper and the Mayor,
he does not shake hands with them. ‘“I beg pardon,” said Mr. Datchery,
making a leg with his hat under his arm.’ Originally this was written
‘hat in hand.’ If he carried his hat under his arm, one hand would be
buried in the hat.
4. Afterwards we read of Datchery following Jasper and the Mayor, ‘with
his hat under his arm, and his shock of white hair streaming in the
evening breeze.’
5. When Datchery is talking to the opium woman, ‘he lounges along, like
the chartered bore of the city, with his uncovered grey hair blowing
about, and his purposeless hands rattling the loose money in the pockets
of his trousers.’ His hands are thus out of sight. Immediately after we
find him ‘still rattling his loose money,’ and again, ‘still rattling.’
6. At last he begins to count out the sum demanded of him by the opium
woman. ‘Greedily watching his hands, she continues to hold forth on the
great example set him.’ Of course, she may merely be watching for the
money in his hands, but there may be something more in it than this. Let
it be noted that Dickens originally wrote, ‘Greedily watching him,’ and
inserted ‘his hands’ later.
7. Immediately after ‘Mr. Datchery drops some money, stoops to pick it
up.’ In all the scene with the opium woman he keeps his hands out of
sight as much as possible, and when he does show them they strike the old
woman.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account