The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of DickensNicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
General
The Problem of 'Edwin Drood': A Study in the Methods of Dickens
Nicoll, W. Robertson (William Robertson), Sir
Cathedrals in literature; Dickens, Charles, 1812-1870. Mystery of Edwin Drood; Murder in literature
‘Was I not to forgive him—I who had turned myself away from him with
a fixed purpose the moment that I found that he had made a mark upon
my heart? I could not wipe off that mark, and yet I married. Was he
not to try to wipe off his mark?’
‘It seems that he wiped it off very quickly; and since that he has
wiped off another mark. One doesn’t know how many marks he has wiped
off. They are like the innkeeper’s score which he makes in chalk. A
damp cloth brings them all away, and leaves nothing behind.’
This shows, at least, that chalk-marking is not a matter of esoteric
knowledge in England, but is known to high and low. I may note that
Dickens inserted the adjective ‘uncouth’—‘a few uncouth, chalked
strokes’—over his original manuscript, to make it clear no doubt that the
scorer was an amateur at the business.
Then there are objections to Datchery’s masculine fare—fried sole, veal
cutlet, and pint of sherry; bread and cheese, and salad and ale. It must
be remembered that Helena was in disguise. This was not a mere disguise
of dress, but it was a disguise of everything. She was assuming a
character and carrying it out. She had all the ability and all the will
for accomplishing this. In doing masculine things she was simply
carrying out her disguise. A woman passing for a man must do what a man
would do or she will fail, and be found out.
It has been suggested that if Datchery is Helena, and therefore knows the
Gatehouse, why does she give it ‘a second look of some interest’? Dr.
Jackson replies very well that the house for her has now a new
importance, and is the object upon which her thoughts are to be
concentrated for weeks, and perhaps for months. But Dickens did not mean
this passage to be printed, for good reasons of his own.
WHAT DICKENS DID NOT MEAN US TO READ
This leads us to note that certain passages which have been much
discussed were not meant for publication by Dickens. That is, he struck
them out in proof. Dr. Jackson points out that in chapter xviii., when
Datchery consults the waiter at the Crozier about ‘a fair lodging for a
single buffer,’ he is obviously asking to be recommended to Tope’s. The
waiter is puzzled at first. When Mr. Datchery asks for ‘something
venerable, architectural, and inconvenient,’ the waiter shakes his head.
‘Anything cathedraly, now?’ Mr. Datchery suggested. Then comes the
mention of Tope. Datchery boggles about the cathedral tower seeking for
lodgings, but Dickens did not mean us to read the words: ‘With a general
impression on his mind that Mrs. Tope’s was somewhere very near it, and
that, like the children in the game of hot boiled beans and very good
butter, he was warm in his search when he saw the tower, and cold when he
didn’t see it.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account