In the New York Engineering News, of Oct. 12, 1893, Mr. Wellington, in
a very interesting article entitled “The Mechanics of Flight,” makes
the following statement: “If the conclusions so far reached in this
paper be accepted, it is obvious that they greatly simplify the problem
of artificial flight by reducing to a minimum the demand for power,
making it chiefly necessary for acquiring the first initial velocity.
All attempts at aviation which include any motor for propulsion are,
in my judgment, on wrong lines, and predestined to certain failure,
since they not only neglect, but destroy, the action of the forces by
which true flight may be and is attained. I will not go so far as to
say that some (soaring) birds, in the exuberance of power, may not use
the wings to accelerate, as they do to retard motion. I think they
do, but only in an abnormal way; it is wholly unnecessary, and even
destructive of all normal flight. The fish needs a propeller, because
it has no gravity in water; the bird does not need it, because it
has gravity, and in that gravity has the best and smoothest of all
conceivable means of propulsion, if he can make the wind lift him
uphill whenever he has slid far enough downhill. If so, man commits an
absurdity when he flies in the face of nature and assumes a propelling
force where none is needed or exists.”
Later on in this article, I wish to describe an instrument, experiments
with which can be made to answer for us the question as to whether or
not a motor is needed; but just here further quotations should be given
to show the trend of the best thought.
Aeronautics (N.Y.) for January contains Professor Langley’s remarkable
paper entitled “The Internal Work of the Wind.” The closing paragraph
is as follows:
“The final application of these principles to the art of aerodromics
seems, then, to be, that while it is not likely that the perfected
aerodrome (air-runner) will ever be able to dispense altogether with
the ability to rely at intervals on some internal source of power, it
will not be indispensable that this aerodrome of the future shall, in
order to go any distance--even to circumnavigate the globe without
alighting,--need to carry a weight of fuel which would enable it
to perform this journey under conditions analogous to those of a
steamship, but that the fuel and weight need only be such as to enable
it to take care of itself in exceptional moments of calm.”
Mr. Octave Chanute, in his admirable chronicle entitled “Progress
in Flying-Machines,” which will soon be published, says in one of
his closing chapters: “But it is possible to utilize a still lighter
power [than that of engines], for we have seen that the wind may be
availed of under favorable circumstances, and that it will furnish an
extraneous motor which costs nothing and imposes no weight upon the
apparatus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account