Robert Rowe, Charles Franks and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team. THE PROBLEM OF THE OHIO MOUNDS. By Cyrus Thomas. CONTENTS Introduction CHAPTER I. Historical evidence CHAPTER II. Similarity of the arts and customs of the mound-builders to those of Indians Architecture Tribal divisions Similarity in burial customs Removal of the flesh before burial Burial beneath or in dwellings Burial in a sitting or squatting posture The use of fire in burial ceremonies Similarity of the stone implements and ornaments of various tribes Mound and Indian pottery CHAPTER III. Stone graves and what they teach CHAPTER IV. The Cherokees as mound-builders CHAPTER V. The Cherokees and the Tallegwi INTRODUCTION. No other ancient works of the United States have become so widely known or have excited so much interest as those of Ohio. This is due in part to their remarkable character but in a much greater degree to the "Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley," by Messrs. Squier and Davis, in which these monuments are described and figured. The constantly recurring question, "Who constructed these works?" has brought before the public a number of widely different theories, though the one which has been most generally accepted is that they originated with a people long since extinct or driven from the country, who had attained a culture status much in advance of that reached by the aborigines inhabiting the country at the time of its discovery by Europeans. The opinion advanced in this paper, in support of which evidence will be presented, is that the ancient works of the State are due to Indians of several different tribes, and that some at least of the typical works, were built by the ancestors of the modern Cherokees. The discussion will be limited chiefly to the latter proposition, as the limits of the paper will not permit a full presentation of all the data which might be brought forward in support of the theory, and the line of argument will be substantially as follows: FIRST. A brief statement of the reasons for believing that the Indians were the authors of all the ancient monuments of the Mississippi Valley and Gulf States; consequently the Ohio mounds must have been built by Indians. SECOND. Evidence that the Cherokees were mound builders after reaching their historic seats in East Tennessee and western North Carolina. This and the preceding positions are strengthened by the introduction of evidence showing that the Shawnees were the authors of a certain type of stone graves, and of mounds and other works connected therewith. THIRD. A tracing of the Cherokees, by the mound testimony and by tradition, back to Ohio. FOURTH. Reasons for believing that the Cherokees were the Tallegwi of tradition and the authors of some of the typical works of Ohio. CHAPTER I. THE HISTORICAL EVIDENCE.