The Problem of the Rupee, Its Origin and Its SolutionAmbedkar, B. R. (Bhimrao Ramji)
History
The Problem of the Rupee, Its Origin and Its Solution
Ambedkar, B. R. (Bhimrao Ramji)
Currency question -- India
The like endeavours of the Government of Madras²² proved more futile
than those of Bengal. The first attempt at bimetallism under the
British in that Presidency was made in the year 1749, when 350 Arcot
rupees were legally rated at 100 Star pagodas. As compared with the
then market ratio this rating involved an under-valuation of the pagoda,
the gold coin of the Presidency. The disappearance of the pagoda caused
a monetary stringency, and the Government in December, 1750, was obliged
to restore it to currency. This it did by adopting the twofold plan of
causing an import of gold on Government account, so as to equalise the
mint ratio to the market ratio, and of compelling the receipts and
payments of Government treasuries to be exclusively in pagodas. The
latter device proved of small value; but the former by its magnitude was
efficacious enough to ease the situation. Unluckily the ease was only
temporary. Between 1756 and 1771 the market ratio of the rupee and the
pagoda again underwent a considerable change. In 1756 it was 364 to
100, and in 1768 it was 370 to 100. It was not till after 1768 that the
market ratio became equal to the legal ratio fixed in 1749 and remained
steady for about twelve years. But the increased imports of silver
rendered necessary for the prosecution of the second Mysore war once
more disturbed the ratio, which at the close of the war stood at 400
Arcot rupees to 100 Star pagodas. After the end of the war the
Government of Madras made another attempt to bring about a concurrent
circulation between the rupee and the pagoda. But instead of making the
market ratio of 400 to 100 the legal ratio it was led by the then
increasing imports of gold into the Presidency to hope that the market
ratio would in time rise to that legally established in 1749. In an
expectant mood so induced it decided, in 1790, to anticipate the event
by fixing the ratio first at 365 to 100. [pg 16] The result was bound
to be different from that desired, for it was an under-valuation of the
pagoda. But instead of rectifying the error, the Government proceeded
to aggravate it by raising the ratio still further to 350 to 100 in
1797, with the effect that the pagoda entirely went out of circulation,
and the final attempt at bimetallism thus ended in a miserable failure.
²² H. Dodwell, “Substitution of Silver for Gold in South India,” in
the _Indian Journal of Economics_, January, 1921.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account