The Problem of the Rupee, Its Origin and Its SolutionAmbedkar, B. R. (Bhimrao Ramji)
History
The Problem of the Rupee, Its Origin and Its Solution
Ambedkar, B. R. (Bhimrao Ramji)
Currency question -- India
[pg 38] rupees, and make it a legal tender for a limited period, when it
might be readjusted and again valued, and made a legal tender for a
similar period at the new rate; (3) to introduce the English sovereign
as a legal tender for Rs. 10, but limited in legal tender to the amount
of Rs. 20 or two sovereigns; or (4) to substitute a gold standard for
the silver standard.
Of these projects the first three were evidently unsafe as currency
expedients. Fixity of value between the various components of the
currency is an essential requisite in a well-regulated monetary system.
Each coin must define a fixed value, in terms of the others realizable
by the most untutored intellect. When it ceases to do so it becomes a
mere commodity, the value of which fluctuates with the fluctuations of
the market. This criterion ruled out the first two projects. To have
introduced a coin as money, the value of which could not be vouched
for—as would have been the case under the first project—from one day to
another, apart from the trouble of computing and ascertaining the
fluctuations, would have been a source of such embarrassment that the
Government, it must be said, acted wisely in not adopting it. There was
no saving grace in the second project to recommend its adoption in
preference to the first. If it had been adopted the result would have
been that during the period that a rate was fixed, gold would have been
forced into circulation supposing that its market value was lower, and
at the end of the year, if it was known that the rate would be revised
and the value of the coin be reduced in conformity with the fall of
gold, a general struggle to get rid of the overrated gold coin and shift
the inevitable loss to the shoulders of others would have certainly
ensued. The third was a somewhat strange proposal. It is possible with
a low-priced metal to strike coins of less than full value for the
purposes of small payments and limit their tender. But this is not
possible with a high-priced metal, the _raison d’être_ of which is to
facilitate large transactions. The objections to the plan could hardly
be concealed. So long as gold was undervalued it would not circulate at
all. But once it became overvalued owing to changes in [pg 39] the
market ratio the rupee would go out of circulation, and shopkeepers and
traders would remain possessed of a coin which would be of no use in
liquidating large transactions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account