Thinking is the activity of our mind which discovers the order,
arrangement, and system in the reality that the senses reveal. Without
thought, our felt experience would be a chaos and not a world. The
philosopher Kant expressed this by saying that the understanding gives
unity to the manifold of sense. The understanding, he said, makes
nature. It does this by giving form to the matter which comes to it by
the senses. The mind is not a _tabula rasa_ upon which the external
world makes and leaves impressions, it is a relating activity which
arranges the matter it receives in forms. First of all there are space
and time, which are forms in which we receive all perceptual
experience, and then there are categories that are conceptual frames or
moulds by which we think of everything we experience as having definite
relations and belonging to a real order of existence. Substance,
causality, quality, and quantity are categories; they are universal
forms in which the mind arranges sense experience, and which constitute
the laws of nature, the order of the world. Space and time, and the
categories of the understanding Kant declared to be
transcendental--that is to say, they are the elements necessary to
experience which are not {27} themselves derived from experience, as,
for example, that every event has a cause. There are, he declared,
synthetic _a priori_ judgments--that is, judgments about experience
which are not themselves derived from experience, but, on the contrary,
the conditions that make experience possible. It is from this doctrine
of Kant that the whole of modern idealism takes its rise. Kant,
indeed, held that there are things-in-themselves, and to this extent he
was not himself an idealist, but he also held that things-in-themselves
are unknowable, and this is essentially the idealist position.
Clearly, if we hold the view that things-in-themselves are unknowable,
truth cannot be a correspondence between our ideas and these
things-in-themselves. Truth must be some quality of the ideas
themselves, and this can only be their logical consistency.
Consistency, because the ideas must be in agreement with one another;
and logical, because this consistency belongs to the thinking, and
logic is the science of thinking. Truth, in effect, is the ideal of
logical consistency. We experience in thinking an activity striving to
attain the knowledge of reality, and the belief, the feeling of
satisfaction that we experience when our thinking seems to attain the
knowledge of reality, is the harmony, the absence of contradiction, the
coherence, of our ideas themselves. This is the coherence theory. Let
us see what it implies as to the ultimate nature of truth and reality.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account