The Progress of Ethnology: An Account of Recent Archaeological, Philological and Geographical Researches in Various Parts of the Globe, Tending to Elucidate the Physical History of ManBartlett, John Russell
History
The Progress of Ethnology: An Account of Recent Archaeological, Philological and Geographical Researches in Various Parts of the Globe, Tending to Elucidate the Physical History of Man
Bartlett, John Russell
Anthropology -- History; Ethnology -- History
These remarks will, perhaps, explain the general composition of Chinese
characters. By far the greater part of them are now formed, either of
the original pictorial symbols, greatly modified, indeed, and changed
from their likeness to the things they stand for, or of those joined to
each other in a compound character, partly symbolical and partly
phonetic. The former part is called the _radical_, the latter the
_primitive_. The Chinese divide the characters into six classes, viz.,
imitative symbols, or those original figures which bore a resemblance to
the forms of material objects; indicative symbols, where the position of
the two parts point out the idea; symbols combining ideas, a class not
very unlike the preceding, but more complex; inverted symbols;
metaphoric symbols, as that of the natural heart, denoting the
affections; and lastly, phonetic symbols. Out of twenty-four thousand
two hundred and thirty-five characters, (nearly all the different ones
there are in the language), twenty-one thousand eight hundred and ten of
them are phonetic, or as much so as the nature of their composition
would allow, though there is no other clue to the sound than to learn
the sound of the parts or of the whole, either from the people
themselves or from a dictionary. The Chinese tyro learns the sounds of
most of the characters, as boys do the names of minerals, by tradition.
As he stands before his master, he and the whole class hear from his
mouth their names, and repeat them until they are remembered.
Consequently, almost an infinite variety in the sounds of the characters
arise from this mode of learning them, while the meanings remain fixed;
though there still remains enough resemblance in the sounds to show
their common origin, as, _bien_, _meen_, _mien_, and _meeng_, all
meaning _the face_, and written with the same character. The local
differences in pronunciation are so great within a few hundred miles, in
some parts of China, that the people barely understand each other when
they speak; and even in two towns fifty miles apart, the local patois
can be detected, though the dissimilarity is not so great as to prevent
their inhabitants conversing together. For purposes of intercourse among
civilians, who being from distant parts of the empire, might otherwise
find considerable difficulty in making themselves understood if each
spoke his own local patois, there is a court dialect which not only
civilians, but all educated men are obliged or expected to understand.
This is the common pronunciation over the northeastern provinces of
Chihli, Shantung, Nganhwui, and Kiangsu, and somewhat in the contiguous
provinces also, though everywhere in these regions with some slight
local variations. This dialect is called _kwan hwa_, and has been
usually termed the _mandarin[109] dialect_, but it is properly the
Chinese spoken language, and the variations from it are the dialects and
patois. It is evident, however, that one sound of a character is no
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account