The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Science
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2
Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Patent medicines
This “formula” is not very enlightening and a physician who wrote for
further details was told that Hyperol contained:
Hydrastin 1/40 gr.
Aloin 1/12 gr.
Iron salts 3 gr.
Apiol (Special) 3 ♏
Ergotin 1 gr.
And excipients.
If this is correct, then, so far as its active ingredients are
concerned, Hyperol is but a mixture of well-known drugs, having
contradictory properties. According to the claims in the circular
quoted above, it is useful both in amenorrhea and in menorrhagia. The
mixture is as unscientific as it is unnecessary. It cannot be adapted
to any individual case; when ergot is indicated, apiol would naturally
be contra-indicated; if aloes is appropriate, hydrastis may defeat the
object sought. It is unnecessary because no intelligent physician would
prescribe such a combination of drugs in any given case. The claims
are exaggerated, improbable and foolish. Hyperol conflicts with the
following rules of the Council:
_Rule 4_, in that statements on the label and in the circular enclosed
with the trade package advertise it to the public in the treatment of
diseases.
_Rule 6_, in that exaggerated and unwarranted claims are made for its
therapeutic qualities.
_Rule 8_, in that the name of this pharmaceutical mixture fails to
disclose the potent constituents.
_Rule 10_, in that it is unscientific.
It is recommended that publication of this report be authorized to call
attention to the unscientific character of such complex mixtures.
[Editor’s Note: Hyperol is advertised in _American Medicine_ and the
_St. Paul Medical Journal_.]--(_From The Journal A. M. A., April 18,
1914._)
INGLUVIN
Report of the Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry
A subcommittee of the Council reported that unwarranted claims and
misrepresentation were made for Ingluvin by its manufacturers,
William R. Warner & Co., recommended that the preparation be refused
recognition and that the report be submitted to Warner & Co. for action.
The report was submitted to the firm, and after waiting one month and
no acknowledgement or reply having been received, the Council directed
its publication. It is as follows:
REPORT ON INGLUVIN
Ingluvin is manufactured by W. R. Warner & Co., chemists, Philadelphia,
Pa. The printed matter contains numerous claims and representations of
which the following are specimens:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account