The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Science
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2
Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Patent medicines
From the preceding investigation, it is concluded that (1) practically
there is no difference between the non-proprietary brands of
“theobromin sodium salicylate” and “Diuretin;” (2) the several
specimens examined were not simple mixtures of “theobromin” and
“sodium salicylate”; (3) essentially all the brands complied with the
standards laid down and can be rated as satisfactory; (4) “Diuretin,”
though sold at an exorbitant price, is not superior to the product
supplied under the descriptive term “theobromin sodium salicylate,” and
(5) “Diuretin” sells wholesale for $1.75 an ounce, against 35 cents
for the “theobromin sodium salicylate,” and therefore its employment
cannot be interpreted otherwise than as a useless and unnecessary
expense.--(_From The Journal A. M. A., April 4, 1914._)
UNGUENTINE
W. A. Puckner and A. H. Clark
Attention has been called at various times to the fact that the value
of a published “formula” to a proprietary remedy is in direct ratio
to the reliability of the manufacturer publishing it. When medical
journals first insisted on their advertisers letting physicians
know the contents of the remedies they wished to sell them, medical
literature reeked with formulas--some of them of weird and wonderful
design. Since the advent of the Food and Drugs Act, which requires
that labels shall approximate truthfulness, and particularly since
the Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry has investigated a number of
proprietary remedies, the publication of “formulas” is not so common.
Unguentine, manufactured by the Norwich Pharmacal Co., is one of those
remedies whose advertisement for years always included “a formula”;
more recently, however, this is not in evidence. In an advertisement
which appeared about ten years ago, the “formula” given is:
“Carbolic acid 2 per cent.
“Ichthyol 5 per cent.
“Alum 15 to 16 per cent.”
It was claimed that, by a special process of their own, the
manufacturers had eliminated most of the astringent properties of the
alum, rendering it non-irritant. It was also stated that “the base of
Unguentine is pure petrolatum.” Later the manufacturers seem to have
changed the composition of their product, or at least the “formula”
given in the advertisements was changed. Thus it appeared:
“Alum 15 per cent.
“Zinc oxid 5 per cent.
“Carbolic acid 2 per cent.
“Ichthyol 5 per cent.
“Aromatics and antiseptic oils with specially
prepared petrolatum and animal fat base.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account