The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2 — John Shaqi
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Science
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 1 of 2
Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Patent medicines
In June, 1914, at the request of the Maltbie Chemical Company, the
Council undertook a reconsideration of the preparation. The advertising
claims were now found more conservative. Before the existing claims
could be judged, however, the Council deemed it necessary to require
from the company satisfactory proof (1) that the large doses of
Calcreose recommended and administered actually furnish large amounts
of creosote to the blood, and (2) that patients taking these large
doses do not suffer from digestive disturbances, loss of nutrition,
albumin in the urine or phenol urine, as claimed. The Council
accordingly advised the company of this requirement, at the same
time stipulating that nothing in the report should be interpreted as
indicating a belief on the part of the Council that enormous doses of
creosote are necessary for, or will promote a cure of tuberculosis.
The Maltbie Chemical Company has not up to the present date furnished
this proof, but has evinced a disposition to make the Council’s holding
Calcreose under advisement appear in the guise of a quasi-approval.
It is therefore recommended that Calcreose be refused recognition for
conflict with Rule 6.--(_From the Journal A. M. A., June 26, 1915._)
CAMPHO-PHENIQUE
Report of the Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry
and Some Comments Thereon
The following report was submitted to the Council on Pharmacy and
Chemistry by the subcommittee to which Campho-Phenique had been
assigned:
_To the Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry_:--Campho-Phenique, sold by
the Campho-Phenique Co., St. Louis, Mo., is claimed to be composed of
phenol 49 per cent., and camphor 51 per cent.
Examination of specimens, purchased in the open market, made under
our direction, demonstrates that the statements made in regard to
the composition are not true. Instead of containing 49 per cent. of
phenol (carbolic acid), the analysis showed that it contains not more
than 20 per cent. Instead of containing 51 per cent. of camphor, the
analysis demonstrates that the amount of camphor is not more than 38
per cent. Besides phenol and camphor, a third substance was found
which proved to be liquid petrolatum and to be present to the extent
of 38 per cent. or more.
Since the statements made in regard to the composition of
Campho-Phenique are deliberate misrepresentations of the facts, it is
recommended that the article be not approved.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account