The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 2 of 2Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Science
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 2 of 2
Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Patent medicines
_III. Chemical Properties of Iodeol._--From a study of different
specimens of Iodeol, the referee concludes that fresh specimens contain
no free iodin and that old ones contain small amounts as a result of
decomposition. Iodeol has the solubility characteristics of fats and
fat-like compounds. The examination, as a whole, shows that Iodeol
contains a peculiar and rather resistant form or combination of iodin.
There is nothing in the chemical data that suggests that it could act
differently from ordinary iodin compounds, such as iodized fats. It
would not act as ordinary iodin.
_IV. Pharmacologic Data._--The pharmacologic statements which were
submitted were loose and apparently meaningless or misleading. In
reply to questions submitted by the referee, the manufacturer finally
had some work done and submitted a report by Jean Laumonnier. The
referee was unable to confirm some of this work, and as a whole it
does not appear materially to elucidate the action of Iodeol. From a
consideration of the submitted evidence, and as a result of his own
work, the referee concludes that Iodeol does not behave like elementary
iodin; it does not coagulate proteins and therefore is not irritant. It
is presumably absorbed, but quite probably after chemical change; it is
changed into iodid and, like organic iodids, is excreted somewhat more
slowly than when inorganic iodids are administered, but the difference
does not appear important.
_V. Antiseptic and Bactericidal Action._--Elementary iodin is
considered a fairly powerful agent in these respects. The activity
is presumably due to changes in the proteins, etc., of the bacteria,
analogous to the effects which produce pain, irritation and necrosis of
the tissue cells. Since the latter effect is not produced by Iodeol,
it seems highly improbable, if not impossible, that it should act on
bacteria like elementary iodin. It is entirely unjustifiable to credit
the known antibacterial qualities of ordinary iodin to “colloid” iodin.
This misrepresentation is especially prominent in the circular “Notable
New Therapeutic Agents,” as will be seen, for instance, from the
following citations:
“Iodine has long been universally recognized as an antiseptic of
extraordinary potency. Not only is it rapid and certain in its
germ-destroying action, but it also possesses an attribute denied
many other antiseptic agents, namely, the power to penetrate and
impregnate the tissues. Other antiseptics, as is well known, act on
the surface epithelium only.”
“According to Kinnaman (J. A. M. A., Aug. 26, 1905), iodine is far
superior to bichloride of mercury, a two per cent. solution killing
streptococcus pyogenes in two minutes. Iodine does not coagulate
albumin, and is very penetrating.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account