The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 2 of 2Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Science
The Propaganda for Reform in Proprietary Medicines, Vol. 2 of 2
Council on Pharmacy and Chemistry (American Medical Association)
Patent medicines
_Second._--The New York Pharmacal Association cites the work of several
chemists, who have examined Lactopeptine and report the presence of
tryptic activity. Dr. S. R. Benedict in December, 1913, reported to
the Council “distinct” tryptic activity (digestion in twelve hours by
Lactopeptine of 4.2 times its weight of fibrin containing 50 per cent.
moisture) in specimens examined by him. These specimens were numbered
2382, and were therefore probably manufactured in October, 1913;
compare the dates furnished by the manufacturer for the specimens used
by the second referee. No tests against other preparations possessing
tryptic activity are reported, and Dr. Benedict expressly disclaims
any opinion as to the therapeutic value of the preparation.[27] Dr.
P. B. Hawk, whose report was submitted by the manufacturers, found in
Lactopeptine by Fermi’s method one-fifth tryptic activity of that of
Merck’s pancreatin, and by Grützner’s method an activity of 18 per
cent. of the pancreatin. A test for the production of tryptophan was
reported positive. The New York Pharmacal Association also submitted
a report from Dr. A. W. Balch, who found pepsin, rennin, trypsin,
steapsin, amylopsin and lactic acid present in Lactopeptine; also
an amount of combined hydrochloric acid in 1 gm. the equivalent of
1.05 c.c. tenth normal solution or 0.00383 gm. hydrochloric acid. (He
reports digestion in twenty-four hours by Lactopeptine of 25 times its
own weight of fibrin. “An active extract of pancreas reacted exactly
like the Lactopeptine solution.”) The serial numbers of the specimens
tested by Hawk and Balch are not given, but no doubt they were fresh.
[27] Dr. Benedict’s personal communication to a member of the Council
is as follows:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account