Church of England -- Customs and practices; Church of England -- Doctrines; Ritualism
But where do we find any account of a gorgeous and elaborate ritual in
heaven? We do, I acknowledge, read of one gorgeous dress “of purple and
scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls;” but
that was on the harlot. In all besides there is perfect simplicity. The
bride has no dress but “fine linen, clean and white;” and when the elders
were honoured with crowns, they cast them at the feet of the Lamb, that
all eyes might be fixed on Him, and all heaven give Him His honour. Nor
was there any gorgeous ritual under the law. It is true that the high
priest wore a dress adorned with precious stones and the most costly
material that could be procured, but that was for the simple reason that
what he wore was typical of the glorious attributes of our blessed
Redeemer. But the dress of the ordinary priests was perfectly simple.
And as for ritual, it was minute because it was prophetic: it was a
pictorial prophecy, and therefore of necessity accurate. But in other
respects we find no directions whatever. The argument therefore
completely falls to the ground; and we have to consider simply the
position occupied by ritual in the New Testament. And what do we find
there? Absolutely nothing: not even in the administration of the
sacraments do we find a single direction beyond the name and the water in
Baptism, and the use of bread and wine in the Lord’s Supper. Beyond
these points not a hint is given. Whether it should be received
standing, sitting, or kneeling; what words should be used, and who should
use them; whether there should be a liturgy or extempore prayer, and
indeed whether there should be any prayer at all,—all these things are
left without any notice in the Word of God.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account