The proposed union of the telegraph and postal systems: Statement of the Western Union Telegraph CompanyWestern Union Telegraph Company
History
The proposed union of the telegraph and postal systems: Statement of the Western Union Telegraph Company
Western Union Telegraph Company
Postal service -- United States; Telegraph -- History -- 19th century; Telegraph -- Law and legislation -- United States
It was not until several years after the introduction of the electric
telegraph in America that it was opened to the people by any European
government. Even in France the electric telegraph was established as
late as 1851, and its spread throughout the empire was exceedingly slow.
The semaphore telegraph, a defective and inefficient system of conveying
intelligence by the exhibition of signals,—introduced by Napoleon at the
beginning of the present century,—was still in use, and, notwithstanding
the manifest advantages of the electric telegraph, as shown by Arago to
the House of Deputies, government long refused to employ it, and, when
finally adopted, it was for some time used in connection with the old
system.
THE SHORTCOMINGS OF BRITISH TELEGRAPHS.
Mr. Washburne says of the British telegraph:—
“In Great Britain, as in the United States, the telegraph was left
to private enterprise and competition. Only a few weeks since, after
a twenty years’ trial of the system in the hands of private
companies, the people of the British islands, with singular
unanimity, demanded to have the telegraphic system placed under the
control of the postal authorities, and a bill was introduced by the
present government for that purpose.”
It is complained of Great Britain, which provides one quarter of all the
telegraph offices in Europe, that the telegraph companies there have
left eighty-eight places in England and Wales having a population of two
thousand and upwards, and even whole districts, without an office.
Whatever may be true of the meagreness of the provision of telegraphic
facilities by English companies, and which these companies vigorously
deny, no such complaint can, with justice, be made in the United States,
notwithstanding the vast ranges of territory which must be traversed to
meet the communities which need and ask for them.
Without intending any disrespect to the postal authorities of the United
States, it may be said that the post-office system of Great Britain,
because of the superior character of the control which long and careful
study has enabled it to secure, is far in advance of our own. In fact,
there is nothing more apparent to an English visitor than the low
_status_ of our postal arrangements, as compared with that of his own
country. It is natural, therefore, seeing the postal system so admirably
managed, that English merchants, whose tendencies are all toward
governmental direction in matters of this character,[5] should desire to
see the experiment of a similar control of the telegraph. In fact, it is
only this class of citizens who have asked for the change, the memorial
having gone solely from the different Chambers of Commerce throughout
the kingdom, no appeal on the subject having ever been made to or by the
people of Great Britain, and therefore the assertion that the people
with singular unanimity demanded it is not sustained by the facts.
Footnote 5:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account