The proposed union of the telegraph and postal systems: Statement of the Western Union Telegraph CompanyWestern Union Telegraph Company
History
The proposed union of the telegraph and postal systems: Statement of the Western Union Telegraph Company
Western Union Telegraph Company
Postal service -- United States; Telegraph -- History -- 19th century; Telegraph -- Law and legislation -- United States
“Imperfection has existed at all times and in all places. It is in
vain to attempt to obtain equally rapid and exact transmission under
all circumstances. Delay will occur, whatever may be done to prevent
it, by the blocking up of lines, by a temporary influx of business;
and, in a country where distances are short, that delay may equal,
and sometimes even exceed, the time that would be occupied in
transmitting by railway.”
Official truthfulness and modesty thus lifts the veil from a system held
up for our admiration, and reveals its weakness.
INSTRUCTIVE HISTORY OF BELGIAN TELEGRAPHS.
The history of the use of the telegraph in Belgium is instructive.
During 1851, the first recorded year of its existence, there passed
between the offices of the whole of that kingdom, as shown by Mr.
Washburne’s tables, twenty-one messages per day. If we may suppose, what
seems scarcely credible, that only five of her chief cities were at that
time connected by the wires,—Ghent, Antwerp, Brussels, Bruges, and
Liege,—it exhibited the remarkable spectacle of a telegraph line opened
by government “in the interest of the people,” used to the extent of
about four messages per day at each of her five chief cities!
Even after four years more had been used in the extension of her lines,
the daily transmission only increased to fifty-five messages per day for
the whole kingdom, showing how slowly and jealously the lines were given
to public employment, and how utterly futile is the assertion that the
public interest, at that time at least, controlled the state in their
management.
The tariff, which had averaged during the first year $1.26 per message,
and had not, so far, been practically reduced, showed still more clearly
that only the rich used it, and that it was, on account of its cost,
practically beyond the employment of the people. The truth is, as Mr.
Washburne states, that the Belgian government, fearing its use in
private hands, and suspicious that by private energy the telegraph would
be made to rival, if not ruin, the Belgian post, seized and held it from
popular control. There is certainly nothing in the first five years of
its existence in Belgium which proves that government, as is claimed,
desired to give the fruits of a great invention to the Belgian people.
During all of these years, however, and in marked contrast to the lines
under government management everywhere, hundreds of thousands of
messages were passing over the telegraph lines in the United States, at
a tariff which made them available to all its citizens, and showing a
daily record in some of the smaller of its inland towns greater than
that of all the Belgian offices combined.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account