Delolm de Lalaubie. VIVISECTION, DISS. IN. (Paris, 1868.) Deswattines. SUGGESTIF PETIT TABLEAU DE LA CRUELLE ET INUTILÉ VIVISECTION. (_Médecin_, 1904, 35.) Ferguson (Sir W.). OPINIONS OF EMINENT SURGEONS, PHYSIOLOGISTS AND OTHERS, AS TO THE FOLLY AND MISLEADING AND DEMORALISING RESULTS OF VIVISECTION. (London, 1880.) Fletcher. A FEW NOTES ON CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, ON THE INADEQUACY OF PENAL LAW. (8vo, London, 1846.) Foreau de Courmelles. ESSAI DE LIMITATION SCIENTIFIQUE DE LA VIVISECTION. (_Revue méd._, 1902, 481-484.) Foster (M.). VIVISECTION. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1873, pp. 672-685.) Gamgee (S.). ON VIVISECTION AND SCIENTIFIC SURGERY. (_Brit. Med. Journ._ (2), 1876, 104.) Gützlaw (V.). SCHOPENHAUER ÜBER DIE THIERE UND DER THIERSCHUTZ. (8vo, Berlin, 1879.) Harnack (E.). WIDER DIE V.-GEGNER. (_D. med. Woch._, 1905, 1115-1116.) Harvey. THE PASTEUR INSTITUTE AND VIVISECTION. (_Ind. Med. Gaz._, 1895, 49-57.) Hehir (P.). VIVISECTION SO CALLED, ITS ROLE IN THE SERVICE OF MAN AND BEAST. (_Ind. Med. Gaz._, 1897, 91.) Heidenhain (R.). DIE V. IM DIENSTE DER HEILKUNDE. (8vo, Leipzig, 1879.) Hermann (L.). DIE V. FRAGE. (8vo, Leipzig, 1877.) Hodge. THE VIVISECTION QUESTION. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1896, 614-630, 771-786.) Horsley (V.). and Rutter (A.). THE MORALITY OF VIVISECTION. (_Nineteenth Century_, 1892, pp. 804-817.) Hutton (R. H.). THE BIOLOGISTS ON VIVISECTION. (_Nineteenth Century_, 1882, 29-39, and _Contemp. Rev._, 1883, 510-516.) Jäger (G.). V. UND HEILKUNST. (_Jägers Monatsbl._, 1905, 137-141, 173-183, 197-203.) Keen (W. W.). OUR RECENT DEBTS TO VIVISECTION. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1889, 1-15 and _Harper's Mag._, 1893, pp. 28-139.) Keen (W. W.). MISSTATEMENTS OF THE ANTI-VIVISECTIONISTS AGAIN. (_Phil. Med. Jour._, 1901, 204-206.) Kingsford (A.). THE USELESSNESS OF VIVISECTION. (_Nineteenth Century_, 1882, 171-183.) Kleffer (H.). LA VIVISECTION, SON UTILITÉ, SA MORALE. (GENÈVE, GEORG, 12mo, 1883.) Lawson (H.). THE VIVISECTION CLAMOUR. (_Pop. Sc. Rev._, 1876, 398-405.) Leffingwell. VIVISECTION, A REPLY TO PROF. H. WOOD. (_Bost. Med. and Surg. Journ._, 1899, 371.) Leneveu (G.). DE L'UTILITÉ DE LA VIVISECTION. (Diss, in., Paris, 1883.) Lund (P. W.). PHYSIOLOGISCHE RESULTATE DER V. NEUERER ZEIT (_trad. du Danois_). (Kopenhagen, 1825.) Macphail (J. A.). VIVISECTION. (_Montreal Med. Journ._, 1890, 895-919.) Magnan. DE LA FOLIE DES ANTIVIVISECTIONNISTES. (_C. R. de la Soc. de Biol. de Paris_, 1884, 101-104.) Maréchal (Ph.). LA VIVISECTION. (_Médecin_, 1904, 35, and _Revue du Cien_, 13-15.) Maurel. LA VIVISECTION EST ELLE INDISPENSABLE. (_Ass. pour l'ac. des sciences_, 1901, 294.) Merbach. UEBER DIE GESCHICHTE DER V. (_Jahresb. d. Ges. f. Nat. u. Heilk. in Dresd._ 1878, 98-103.) Metzger (D.). LA VIVISECTION, LES DANGERS, ET LES CRIMES. (8vo, Paris, 1891.) Moore (W. J.). HARVEY AND VIVISECTION. (_Ind. Med. Gaz._, 1876, 230-233.) Moquin Tandon. RAPPORT SUR LES VIVISECTIONS. (_Bull. de l'ac. de Médecine de Paris_, 1862, 948-960.)