Nagel (R.). DER WISSENSCHAFTLICHE UNWERTH DER V IN ALLEN IHREN ARTEN. (8vo, Berlin, 1881.) Novi (J.). SULLA V. (_Boll. d. sc. med. di Bologne_, 1893, 263, 421.) Paget (Stephen). EXPERIMENTS ON ANIMALS. (_Murray_). Renault (E.). LA SOC. PROTECTS. DES ANIMAUX ET LA VIVISECTION. (_Rec. de Méd. vétérin._, 1862, 231-247.) Renooz (C). A PROPOS DE LA VIVISECTION. (_Médecin_, 1904, 178-179.) Richet (Ch.). MAN'S RIGHT OVER ANIMALS. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1884, xxv., 759-766.) Smith (R. M.). MATERIA MEDICA AND VIVISECTION. (_Merck's Arch._, 1900, 44-47.) Smith (R. M.). SHOULD EXPERIMENTS ON ANIMALS BE RESTRICTED OR ABOLISHED? (_Therap. Gaz._, 1884, 497, 533.) Smith (Pye). ON VIVISECTION. (_Brit. Med. Journ._ (2), 1879, 349.) Stuser (E.). IS VIVISECTION A BENEFIT TO ANIMALS AND MAN, AND JUSTIFIABLE? (_Med. News_, 1902, 108-111.) Tait (Lawson.). THE USELESSNESS OF VIVISECTION UPON ANIMALS AS A METHOD OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH. (London, 8vo, 1883 (?).) Tuckermann. ABSTRACT OF THE REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON VIVISECTION. (_Columb. Med. Journ._, 1897, 237-243.) Weber (E.). LES CHAMBRES DE TORTURE DE LA SCIENCE. (Paris, Leroux, 8vo, 1879.) Wilberforce (C). WOMEN, CLERGYMEN AND DOCTORS. (_New Review_, 1893, 85-95.) Wilks. THE ETHICS OF VIVISECTION. (_Pop. Sc. Monthly_, 1882, xxi., 344-350.) Williams. A FEW PERSONAL FACTS CONCERNING EXPERIMENTS ON ANIMALS OPPOSED TO THE FALSE FANCIES OF THE PERSECUTORS OF VIVISECTORS. (_Brit. Med. Journ._, (2), 1876, 104.) Wolff. DISPUTATIO PHILOSOPHICA DE MORALITATE ANATOMES CIRCA ANIMALIA VICA OCCUPATAE. (Leipzig, 1709.) Wood (H.). THE CONTROL OF VIVISECTION. (_Bost. Med. and Surg. Journ._, 1895, 342.) Zöllner (F.). UEBER DER WISSENSCHAFTLICHEN MISSBRAUCH DER V., MIT HISTORISCHEN DOCUMENTEN ÜBER DIE V. VON MENSCHEN. (Leipzig, 8vo, 1880, 2nd ed., 1885.) APPENDIX C THE RESEARCH DEFENCE SOCIETY In January 1908, a Society with the above name was formed in England, the aims and objects of which are clearly stated in the following letter from Lord Cromer, its President; this letter was published in the English newspapers on 24th April 1908:-- SIR, A Society has been formed, with the name of the Research Defence Society, to make known the facts as to experiments on animals in this country; the immense importance to the welfare of mankind of such experiments; and the great saving of human life and health directly attributable to them. The great advance that has been made during the last quarter of a century in our knowledge of the functions of the body, and of the causes of disease, would have been impossible without a combination of experiment and observation. The use of antiseptics, and the modern treatment of wounds, is the direct outcome of the experiments of Pasteur and Lister. Pasteur's discovery of the microbial cause of puerperal fever has in itself enormously reduced the deaths of women in child-birth. The nature of tuberculosis is now known, and its incidence has materially diminished.