The Protestants Plea for a Socinian: Justifying His Doctrine from Being Opposite to Scripture or Church Authority; and Him from Being Guilty of Heresie, or Schism — John Shaqi
The Protestants Plea for a Socinian: Justifying His Doctrine from Being Opposite to Scripture or Church Authority; and Him from Being Guilty of Heresie, or SchismR. H.
Religion
The Protestants Plea for a Socinian: Justifying His Doctrine from Being Opposite to Scripture or Church Authority; and Him from Being Guilty of Heresie, or Schism
R. H.
Socinianism -- Early works to 1800
_Prot._ Why, such a submission of Judgment and Assent I suppose you
will presently yield to me in any thing, whereof you are convinced by
me; may this future Council then challenge no further Duty from you?
why then should the Church be troubled to call it?
_Soc._ [57]_Though this Future Council also should err, yet it may
afford Remedy against Inconveniences; and one great Inconvenience
being, Breaking the Church's Peace; this is remedied by its
Authority_, if I only yield the Obedience of Silence thereto.
_Prot._ But if your Obedience oblige not to _silence_ concerning
Councils past, because of your new Evidences, neither will it to a
future, if you think it also doth err; and either these Evidences
remain still unsatisfied, or these satisfied, yet some other new ones
appear to call for a new Consideration.
_Soc._ [58]_Because it may also err, it follows not it must err; and
it is probable that it shall not err, when the former Error is thus
discovered, and if the Council proceed lawfully, be not overawed,_
&c.[59] But however, if I ought upon this review to be restrained to
_silence_, yet, I not convinced of the truth of its Decree, this
Silence is the uttermost that any future Council, after its rejecting
my Reasons, can justly exact of me; and not _belief_, or _assent_, at
all: It may not oblige me, that I should relinquish that you call
_Socinianism_ at all, but that, not divulge it; whereas now by the
Acts of _former_ Councils (I would gladly know upon what rational
ground) an _Anathema_ is pronounced against me, if I do not believe
the contrary, and I am declared to stand guilty of _Heresie_ meerly
for retaining this Opinion; which retaining it is called _obstinacy_
and _contumacy_ in me, after the Councils contrary _Definition_.
[41] _p._ 515, 516.
[42] _See before_, §. 13.
[43] §. 13.
[44] _See Baronius._ A. D. 318, 319.
[45] §. 478.
[46] _p._ 60.
[47] _Ib._ §. 10.
[48] _Whitby_, _p._ 15. _Stillingfleet_, _p._ 506, 537.
[49] §. 32. _n._ 5. & §. 33. _consid._ 5. _n._ 1.
[50] _Dr. Ferne, Case between the Churches_, _p._ 48, 49.
& _Division of Churches_, _p._ 45.
[51] _p._ 666.
[52] _A. B. Laud_ 245.
[53] _Id._ _p._ 227.
[54] _Stillingfl. p._ 479, 292.
[55] _See before, Disc_. 3. §. 34, _&c._
[56] _De Baptismo_, _l._ 2. _c._ 3.
[57] _Stillingfl. p._ 542.
[58] _Stillingfl. ibid._
[59] _Id. p._ 526.
CONFERENCE IV.
His Plea, for his not being guilty of _Heresie_.
_That he cannot rightly according to Protestant Principles, be accused
as guilty of_ Heresie, _for several reasons._
1. _Because Protestants holding Heresie to be an_ obstinate _defence
of some error against a fundamental, he thinks from hence his
tenent freed from being an Heresie, as long as in silence he
retains it, unless he engage further, to a publick pertinacious
maintaining thereof._ §. 23.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account