The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
chambers likewise hewn in the rock, filled with sarcophagi, and with
the entrances adorned with pillars. Traces of public life are nowhere
met with; it is the country-dwellings of the merchants and of the
manufacturers of Apamea and Antioch, whose assured prosperity and solid
enjoyment of life are attested by these ruins. These settlements, of
quite a uniform character, belong throughout to the late times of the
empire, the oldest to the beginning of the fourth century, the latest
to the middle of the sixth, immediately before the onslaught of Islam,
under which this prosperous and flourishing life succumbed. Christian
symbols and Biblical language are everywhere met with, and likewise
stately churches and ecclesiastical structures. The development of
culture, however, did not begin merely under Constantine, but simply
grew and became consolidated in those centuries. Certainly those
stone-buildings were preceded by similar villa and garden structures of
a less enduring kind. The regeneration of the imperial government after
the confused troubles of the third century has its expression in the
upward impulse which the Syrian mercantile world then received; but up
to a certain degree this picture of it left to us may be referred also
to the earlier imperial period.
* * * * *
[Sidenote: Jewish traffic.]
The relations of the Jews in the time of the Roman empire were so
peculiar and, one might say, so little dependent on the province
which was named in the earlier period after them, in the later rather
by the revived name of the Philistaeans or Palaestinenses, that, as
we have already said, it appeared more suitable to treat of them in a
separate section. The little which is to be remarked as to the land
of Palestine, especially the not unimportant share of its maritime
and partly also of its inland towns in Syrian industry and Syrian
trade, has already been mentioned in the exposition given above of
these matters. The Jewish Diaspora had already, before the destruction
of the temple, extended in such a way that Jerusalem, even while it
still stood, was more a symbol than a home, very much as the city of
Rome was for the so-called Roman burgesses of later times. The Jews of
Antioch and Alexandria, and the numerous similar societies of lesser
rights and minor repute took part, as a matter of course, in the
commerce and intercourse of the places where they dwelt. Their Judaism
comes into account in the case only perhaps so far as the feelings
of mutual hatred and mutual contempt, which had become developed or
rather increased since the destruction of the temple, and the repeated
national-religious wars between Jews and non-Jews must have exercised
their effect also in these circles. As the Syrian merchants resident
abroad met together in the first instance for the worship of their
native deities, the Syrian Jew in Puteoli cannot well have belonged to
the Syrian merchant-guilds there; and, if the worship of the Syrian
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account