The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
The short-sightedness and narrow-mindedness--we may here say, the
perversity and brutality--of the foreign government of the Roman
republic had nowhere so full sway as in Africa. In southern Gaul,
and still more in Spain, the Roman government pursued at least a
consolidated extension of territory, and, half involuntarily, the
rudiments of Latinising; in the Greek East the foreign rule was
mitigated and often almost compensated by the power of Hellenism
forcing the hand even of hard policy. But as to this third continent
the old national hatred towards the Poeni seemed still to reach beyond
the grave of Hannibal’s native city. The Romans held fast the territory
which Carthage had possessed at its fall, but less in order to develop
it for their own benefit than to prevent its benefiting others, not
to awaken new life there, but to watch the dead body; it was fear and
envy, rather than ambition and covetousness, that created the province
of Africa. Under the republic it had not a history; the war with
Jugurtha was for Africa nothing but a lion-hunt, and its historical
significance lay in its connection with the republican party struggles.
The land was, as a matter of course, turned to full account by Roman
speculation; but neither might the destroyed great city rise up afresh,
nor might a neighbouring town develop into a similar prosperity; there
were here no standing camps as in Spain and Gaul; the Roman province,
with its narrow bounds, was on all sides surrounded by relatively
civilised territory of the dependent king of Numidia, who had helped
in the work of the destruction of Carthage, and now, as a reward
for it, received not so much the spoil as the task of protecting it
from the inroads of the wild hordes of the interior. That thereby a
political and military importance was given to this state, such as no
other client-state of Rome ever possessed, and that even on this side
the Roman policy, in order merely to banish the phantom of Carthage,
conjured up serious dangers, was shown by the share of Numidia in the
civil wars of Rome; never during all the internal crises of the empire
before or after did a client-prince play such a part as the last king
of Numidia in the war of the republicans against Caesar.
[Sidenote: Caesar’s African policy.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account