The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
All the more necessarily the state of things in Africa became
transformed by this decision of arms. In the other provinces, as a
consequence of the civil wars, there was a change of rule; in Africa
there was a change of system. The African possession of the Phoenicians
itself was not a proper dominion over Africa; it may be in some measure
compared with the dominion in Asia Minor of the Hellenes before
Alexander. Of this dominion the Romans had then taken over but a small
part, and of that part they had nipped the bud. Now Carthage arose
afresh, and, as if the soil had only been waiting for the seed, soon
flourished anew. The whole country lying behind--the great kingdom of
Numidia--became a Roman province, and the protection of the frontier
against the barbarians was undertaken by the Roman legionaries.
The kingdom of Mauretania became, in the first instance, a Roman
dependency, and soon also a part of the Roman empire. With the dictator
Caesar the civilising and Latinising of Africa took their place among
the tasks of the Roman government. Here we have to set forth how the
task was carried out, first as to the outward organisation, and then as
to the arrangements made and results achieved for the several districts.
[Sidenote: Extent of the Roman rule.]
Territorial sovereignty over the whole of North Africa had doubtless
already been claimed on the part of the Roman republic, perhaps as a
portion of the Carthaginian inheritance, perhaps because “our sea”
early became one of the fundamental ideas of the Roman commonwealth;
and, in so far, all its coasts were regarded by the Romans even of the
developed republic as their true property. Nor had this claim of Rome
ever been properly contested by the larger states of North Africa after
the destruction of Carthage; if in many places the neighbours did not
submit to the dominion, they were just as little obedient to their
local rulers. That the silver moneys of king Juba I. of Numidia and of
king Bogud of Mauretania were coined after the Roman standard, and the
Latin legend--little as it was suited to the relations of language and
of intercourse then subsisting in North Africa--was never absent from
them, was the direct recognition of the Roman supremacy, a consequence,
it may be presumed, of the new organisation of North Africa that in the
year 674 U.C. {80 B.C.} was accomplished by Pompeius. The generally
insignificant resistance which the Africans, apart from Carthage,
opposed to the Romans, came from the descendants of Massinissa; after
king Jugurtha, and later king Juba, were vanquished, the princes of the
western country submitted without more ado to the dependence required
of them. The arrangements which the emperors made were carried out
quite after the same way in the territory of the dependent princes as
in the immediate territory of Rome; it was the Roman government that
regulated the boundaries in all North Africa, and constituted Roman
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account