The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
[Sidenote: Continuance of the Phoenician language.]
The language which prevailed in North Africa, when it became Roman,
was that of the foreign rule which preceded the Roman. Leptis,
probably not the Tripolitan, but that near Hadrumetum, was the only
African town which marked its coins with a Greek legend, and thus
conceded to this language an at least secondary position in public
intercourse. The Phoenician language prevailed at that time so far as
there was a civilisation in North Africa, from Great Leptis to Tingi,
most thoroughly in and around Carthage, but not less in Numidia and
Mauretania.[291] To this language of a highly developed although
foreign culture certain concessions were made on the change in the
system of administration. Perhaps already under Caesar, certainly under
Augustus and Tiberius, as well the towns of the Roman province, such as
Great Leptis and Oea, as those of the Mauretanian kingdom, like Tingi
and Lix, employed in official use the Phoenician language, even those
which like Tingi had become Roman burgess-communities. Nevertheless
they did not go so far in Africa as in the Greek half of the empire. In
the Greek provinces of the empire the Greek language prevailed, as in
business intercourse generally, so particularly in direct intercourse
with the imperial government and its officials; the coin of the city
organised after the Greek fashion names also the emperor in Greek. But
in the African the coin, even if it speaks in another language, names
the emperor or the imperial official always in Latin. Even on the coins
of the kings of Mauretania the name of the Greek queen stands possibly
in Greek, but that of the king--also an imperial official--uniformly in
Latin, even where the queen is named beside him. That is to say, even
the government did not admit the Phoenician in its intercourse with the
communities and individuals in Africa, but it allowed it for internal
intercourse; it was not a third imperial language, but a language of
culture recognised in its own sphere.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account