The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
But this limited recognition of the Phoenician language did not long
subsist. There is no document for the public use of Phoenician from
the time after Tiberius, and it hardly survived the time of the first
dynasty.[292] How and when the change set in we do not know; probably
the government, perhaps Tiberius or Claudius, spoke the decisive word
and accomplished the linguistic and national annexation of the African
Phoenicians as far as it could be done by state authority. In private
intercourse the Phoenician held its ground still for a long time in
Africa, longer apparently than in the motherland; at the beginning
of the third century ladies of genteel houses in Great Leptis spoke
so little Latin or Greek, that there was no place for them in Roman
society; even at the end of the fourth there was a reluctance to
appoint clergymen in the environs of Hippo Regius (Bona), who could
not make themselves intelligible in Punic to their countrymen; these
termed themselves at that time still Canaanites, and Punic names
and Punic phrases were still current. But the language was banished
from the school[293] and even from written use, and had become a
popular dialect; and even this probably only in the region of the old
Phoenician civilisation, particularly the old Phoenician places on the
coast that stood aloof from intercourse on a large scale.[294] When the
Arabs came to Africa they found as language of the country doubtless
that of the Berbers, but no longer that of the Poeni;[295] with the
Carthagino-Roman civilisation the two foreign languages disappeared,
while the old native one still lives in the present day. The civilised
foreign dominions changed; the Berbers remained like the palm of the
oasis and the sand of the desert.
[Sidenote: The Latin language.]
The heritage of the Phoenician language fell not to Greek, but to
Latin. This was not involved in the natural development. In Caesar’s
time the Latin and the Greek were alike in North Africa foreign
languages, but as the coins of Leptis already show, the latter by
far more diffused than the former; Latin was spoken then only by the
officials, the soldiers, and the Italian merchants. It would have at
that time been probably easier to introduce the Hellenising of Africa
than the Latinising of it. But it was the converse that took place.
Here the same will prevailed, which did not allow the Hellenic germs to
spring up in Gaul, and which incorporated Greek Sicily into the domain
of Latin speech; the same will, which drew the boundaries between the
Latin West and the Greek East, assigned Africa to the former.
[Sidenote: The Phoenician urban organisation.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account