The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
Syria in the narrower sense and its adjoining lands, the Plain Cilicia
and Phoenicia, never had under the Roman emperors a history properly
so called. The inhabitants of these regions belonged to the same
stock as the inhabitants of Judaea and Arabia, and the ancestors of
the Syrians and the Phoenicians were settled in a remote age at one
spot with those of the Jews and the Arabs, and spoke one language.
But while the latter clung to their peculiar character and to their
language, the Syrians and the Phoenicians became Hellenised even before
they came under Roman rule. This Hellenising took effect throughout
in the formation of Hellenic polities. The foundation for this had
indeed been laid by the native development, particularly by the old
and great mercantile cities on the Phoenician coast. But above all the
formation of states by Alexander and the Alexandrids, just like that
of the Roman republic, had as its basis not the tribe, but the urban
community; it was not the old Macedonian hereditary principality,
but the Greek polity that Alexander carried into the East; and it
was not from tribes, but from towns that he designed, and the Romans
designed, to constitute their empire. The idea of the autonomous
burgess-body is an elastic one, and the autonomy of Athens and Thebes
was a different thing from that of the Macedonian and Syrian city, just
as in the Roman circle the autonomy of free Capua had another import
than that of the Latin colonies of the republic or even of the urban
communities of the empire; but the fundamental idea is everywhere
that of self-administering citizenship sovereign within its own
ring-wall. After the fall of the Persian empire, Syria, along with the
neighbouring Mesopotamia, was, as the military bridge of connection
between the West and the East, covered more than any other land with
Macedonian settlements. The Macedonian names of places transferred
thither to the greatest extent, and nowhere else recurring in the
whole empire of Alexander, show that here the flower of the Hellenic
conquerors of the East was settled, and that Syria was to become for
this state the New-Macedonia; as indeed, so long as the empire of
Alexander retained a central government, this had there its seat. Then
the troubles of the last Seleucid period had helped the Syrian imperial
towns to greater independence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account