The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2Mommsen, Theodor
History
The Provinces of the Roman Empire, from Caesar to Diocletian. v. 2
Mommsen, Theodor
Roman provinces -- Administration; Rome -- History -- Empire, 30 B.C.-476 A.D.
These arrangements the Romans found existing. Of non-urban districts
administered directly by the empire there were probably none at all
in Syria according to the organisation planned by Pompeius, and, if
the dependent principalities in the first epoch of the Roman rule
embraced a great portion of the southern interior of the province,
these were withal mostly mountainous and poorly inhabited districts of
subordinate importance. Taken as a whole, for the Romans in Syria not
much was left to be done as to the increase of urban development--less
than in Asia Minor. Hence there is hardly anything to be told from the
imperial period of the founding of towns in the strict sense as regards
Syria. The few colonies which were laid out here, such as Berytus under
Augustus and probably also Heliopolis, had no other object than those
conducted to Macedonia, namely, the settlement of veterans.
[Sidenote: Continuance of the native language and habits under
Hellenism.]
How the Greeks and the older population in Syria stood to one
another, may be clearly traced by the very local names. The majority
of districts and towns here bear Greek names, in great part, as we
have observed, derived from the Macedonian home, such as Pieria,
Anthemusias, Arethusa, Beroea, Chalcis, Edessa, Europus, Cyrrhus,
Larisa, Pella, others named after Alexander or the members of the
Seleucid house, such as Alexandria, Antioch, Seleucis and Seleucia,
Apamea, Laodicea, Epiphaneia. The old native names maintain themselves
doubtless side by side, as Beroea, previously in Aramaean Chalep,
is also called Chalybon, Edessa or Hierapolis, previously Mabog, is
called also Bambyce, Epiphaneia, previously Hamat, is also called
Amathe. But for the most part the older appellations give way before
the foreign ones, and only a few districts and larger places, such as
Commagene, Samosata, Hemesa, Damascus, are without newly-formed Greek
names. Eastern Cilicia has few Macedonian foundations to show; but
the capital Tarsus became early and completely Hellenised, and was
long before the Roman time one of the centres of Hellenic culture.
It was somewhat otherwise in Phoenicia; the mercantile towns of old
renown, Aradus, Byblus, Berytus, Sidon, Tyrus, did not properly lay
aside the native names; but how here too the Greek gained the upper
hand, is shown by the Hellenising transformation of these same names,
and still more clearly by the fact that New-Aradus is known to us only
under the Greek name Antaradus, and likewise the new town founded
by the Tyrians, the Sidonians, and the Aradians in common on this
coast only under the name Tripolis, and both have developed their
modern designations Tartus and Tarabulus from the Greek. Already in
the Seleucid period the coins in Syria proper bear exclusively, and
those of the Phoenician towns most predominantly, Greek legends; and
from the beginning of the imperial period the sole rule of Greek is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account