The provincial letters of Blaise Pascal : $b A new translation, with historical introduction and notes, by the Rev. Thomas M'CriePascal, Blaise
Religion
The provincial letters of Blaise Pascal : $b A new translation, with historical introduction and notes, by the Rev. Thomas M'Crie
Pascal, Blaise
Jansenists -- France -- Early works to 1800; Jesuits -- Early works to 1800; Port-Royal des Champs (Abbey) -- Early works to 1800
To illustrate this by an example, I may refer to the conflicting
sentiments of St. Basil and St. Athanasius, regarding the writings of
St. Denis of Alexandria, which St. Basil, conceiving that he found in
them the sense of Arius against the equality of the Father and the Son,
condemned as heretical, but which St. Athanasius, on the other hand,
judging them to contain the genuine sense of the Church, maintained to
be perfectly orthodox. Think you, then, father, that St. Basil, who held
these writings to be Arian, had a right to brand St. Athanasius as a
heretic, because he defended them? And what ground would he have had for
so doing, seeing that it was not Arianism that his brother defended, but
the true faith which he considered these writings to contain? Had these
two saints agreed about the true sense of these writings, and had both
recognized this heresy in them, unquestionably St. Athanasius could not
have approved of them, without being guilty of heresy; but as they were
at variance respecting the sense of the passages, St. Athanasius was
orthodox in vindicating them, even though he may have understood them
wrong; because in that case it would have been merely an error in a
matter of fact, and because what he defended was really the Catholic
faith, which he supposed to be contained in these writings.
I apply this to you, father. Suppose you were agreed upon the sense of
Jansenius, and your adversaries were ready to admit with you that he
held, for example, _that grace cannot be resisted_; those who refused to
condemn him would be heretical. But as your dispute turns upon the
meaning of that author, and they believe that, according to his
doctrine, _grace may be resisted_, whatever heresy you may be pleased to
attribute to him, you have no ground to brand them as heretics, seeing
they condemn the sense which you put on Jansenius, and you dare not
condemn the sense which they put on him. If, therefore, you mean to
convict them, show that the sense which they ascribe to Jansenius is
heretical; for then they will be heretical themselves. But how could you
accomplish this, since it is certain, according to your own showing,
that the meaning which they give to his language has never been
condemned?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account