The provincial letters of Blaise Pascal : $b A new translation, with historical introduction and notes, by the Rev. Thomas M'CriePascal, Blaise
Religion
The provincial letters of Blaise Pascal : $b A new translation, with historical introduction and notes, by the Rev. Thomas M'Crie
Pascal, Blaise
Jansenists -- France -- Early works to 1800; Jesuits -- Early works to 1800; Port-Royal des Champs (Abbey) -- Early works to 1800
have not? Is it because this is an unimportant article of belief, and
you leave all men at liberty to believe that efficacious grace is
necessary or not, as they choose? Is it a matter of indifference to say,
that with sufficient grace a man may really act?” “How!” cried the good
man; “indifference!—it is heresy—formal heresy. The necessity of
_efficacious grace_ for acting effectively, is a point of _faith_—it is
heresy to deny it.”
“Where are we now?” I exclaimed; “and which side am I to take here? If I
deny the sufficient grace, I am a Jansenist. If I admit it, as the
Jesuits do, in the way of denying that efficacious grace is necessary, I
shall be a heretic, say you. And if I admit it, as you do, in the way of
maintaining the necessity of efficacious grace, I sin against common
sense, and am a blockhead, say the Jesuits. What must I do, thus reduced
to the inevitable necessity of being a blockhead, a heretic, or a
Jansenist? And what a sad pass are matters come to, if there are none
but the Jansenists who avoid coming into collision either with the faith
or with reason, and who save themselves at once from absurdity and from
error!”
My Jansenist friend took this speech as a good omen, and already looked
upon me as a convert. He said nothing to me, however; but, addressing
the monk: “Pray, father,” inquired he, “what is the point on which you
agree with the Jesuits?” “We agree in this,” he replied, “that the
Jesuits and we acknowledge the sufficient grace given to all.” “But,”
said the Jansenist, “there are two things in this expression _sufficient
grace_—there is the sound, which is only so much breath; and there is
the thing which it signifies, which is real and effectual. And,
therefore, as you are agreed with the Jesuits in regard to the word
_sufficient_, and opposed to them as to the sense, it is apparent that
you are opposed to them in regard to the substance of that term, and
that you only agree with them as to the sound. Is this what you call
acting sincerely and cordially?”
“But,” said the good man, “what cause have you to complain, since we
deceive nobody by this mode of speaking? In our schools we openly teach
that we understand it in a manner different from the Jesuits.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account