The provincial letters of Blaise Pascal : $b A new translation, with historical introduction and notes, by the Rev. Thomas M'CriePascal, Blaise
Religion
The provincial letters of Blaise Pascal : $b A new translation, with historical introduction and notes, by the Rev. Thomas M'Crie
Pascal, Blaise
Jansenists -- France -- Early works to 1800; Jesuits -- Early works to 1800; Port-Royal des Champs (Abbey) -- Early works to 1800
My friend, however, who was so ready on the whole question, that I am
inclined to think he had studied it all that very morning, replied:
“This, father, is the last entrenchment to which those of your party who
are willing to reason at all are sure to retreat; but you are far from
being safe even here. The example of the saints is not a whit more in
your favor. Who doubts that they often fall into sins of surprise,
without being conscious of them? Do we not learn from the saints
themselves how often concupiscence lays hidden snares for them; and how
generally it happens, as St. Augustine complains of himself in his
Confessions, that, with all their discretion, they ‘give to pleasure
what they mean only to give to necessity?’
“How usual is it to see the more zealous friends of truth betrayed by
the heat of controversy into sallies of bitter passion for their
personal interests, while their consciences, at the time, bear them no
other testimony than that they are acting in this manner purely for the
interests of truth, and they do not discover their mistake till long
afterwards!
“What, again, shall we say of those who, as we learn from examples in
ecclesiastical history, eagerly involve themselves in affairs which are
really bad, because they believe them to be really good; and yet this
does not hinder the fathers from condemning such persons as having
sinned on these occasions?
“And were this not the case, how could the saints have their secret
faults? How could it be true that God alone knows the magnitude and the
number of our offences; that no one knows whether he is worthy of hatred
or love; and that the best of saints, though unconscious of any
culpability, ought always, as St. Paul says of himself, to remain in
‘fear and trembling?’[126]
“You perceive, then, father, that this knowledge of the evil, and love
of the opposite virtue, which you imagine to be essential to constitute
sin, are equally disproved by the examples of the righteous and of the
wicked. In the case of the wicked, their passion for vice sufficiently
testifies that they have no desire for virtue; and in regard to the
righteous, the love which they bear to virtue plainly shows that they
are not always conscious of those sins which, as the Scripture teaches,
they are daily committing.
“So true is it, indeed, that the righteous often sin through ignorance,
that the greatest saints rarely sin otherwise. For how can it be
supposed that souls so pure, who avoid with so much care and zeal the
least things that can be displeasing to God as soon as they discover
them, and who yet sin many times every day, could possibly have, every
time before they fell into sin, ‘the knowledge of their infirmity on
that occasion, and of their physician, and the desire of their souls’
health, and of praying to God for assistance,’ and that, in spite of
these inspirations, these devoted souls ‘nevertheless transgress,’ and
commit the sin?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account