The psycho-analytic study of the familyFlugel, J. C. (John Carl)
Science
The psycho-analytic study of the family
Flugel, J. C. (John Carl)
Families; Marriage; Parent and child; Psychoanalysis
On the negative side too, there is evidence to be gained from the nature
of the taboos and institutions erected against incest. According to
Frazer[99] the exogamous systems of the Australian aborigines seem to have
originated in the first place as a means of preventing connections between
brother and sister, the prohibition of marriage between other relatives
having been brought about by subsequent developments and elaborations of
the primitive two class system, instituted for the purpose of avoiding
brother-sister marriages. The abhorrence of brother-sister incest is
indeed very marked in many primitive communities, and that this abhorrence
represents the repression of a genuine desire for incest of this kind is
shown by the remarks of travellers that the "avoidances" and other methods
of enforcing the prohibitions are often "very necessary"[100] and by the
fact, already referred to, that as soon as the customary restrictions are
relaxed, the otherwise forbidden connections are freely indulged in. To
this evidence from anthropology there might be added the scarcely less
convincing data from mythology and literature, which has been studied in
such detail by Rank[101] and which perhaps, for this reason, we need not
stop to dwell on here; it being sufficient to remind the reader in passing
of such well known mythological cases as the unions of Zeus and Hera
and of Osiris and Isis, or, as regards literature, to refer him to such
recent examples as Artzibasheff's "Sanine" or d'Annunzio's "City of the
Dead" where the existence of erotic feeling between brother and sister is
treated in an open manner.
[Sidenote: Displacement of parent--regarding tendencies on to more distant
relatives]
As a further stage of development the original parent love may be
displaced, not on to a brother or sister, but on to some more distant
relative, such as a cousin (a brother or sister substitute) or an uncle
or aunt (more directly parent substitutes)[102]. Cousin marriage is,
among ourselves, passing through the stage of being legally permissible
though still regarded with some degree of moral disapproval or suspicion.
In other times and places it has, like brother-sister marriage, been
the object both of sternest prohibition[103] and of warm approval[104].
Any kind of sexual relationship between nephews and aunts or between
nieces and uncles seems to have been, too, reminiscent of the repressed
tendencies to parent-incest to have received sanction either legally
or morally, but unions of this kind have nevertheless sometimes been
found among primitive peoples[105], and are not infrequently present as
objects of desire in the unconscious mind of those who live in civilised
communities to-day.
[Sidenote: Relatives by marriage]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account