The Psychology of ArithmeticThorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Science
The Psychology of Arithmetic
Thorndike, Edward L. (Edward Lee)
Arithmetic -- Study and teaching
23. 1/3 of what unit equals 1/5 of _o_?
24. 2/3 of _d_ equals what unit? _b_ equals how many thirds of _d_?
25. 2 is the ratio of _d_ to 1/3 of what unit? 3 is the ratio of _d_
to 1/2 of what unit?
26. _d_ equals 3/4 of what unit? 3/4 is the ratio of what units?"
[Speer, '97, p. 9f.]
THE RELATIONAL IDEA OVEREMPHASIZED
An inspection of books of the eighties which followed the "Grube
method" (for example, the _New Elementary Arithmetic_ by E.E. White
['83]) will show undue emphasis on the relational ideas. There will be
over a hundred and fifty successive tasks all, or nearly all, on +7
and -7. There will be much written work of the sort shown below:
_Add:_
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 4 4
4 1 2
-- -- --
which must have sorely tried the eyes of all concerned. Pupils are
taught to "give the analysis and synthesis of each of the nine
digits." Yet the author states that he does not carry the principle
of the Grube method "to the extreme of useless repetition and
mechanism."
It should be obvious that all four meanings have claims upon the
attention of the elementary school. Four is the thing between three and
five in the number series; it is the name for a certain sized collection
of discrete objects; it is also the name for a continuous magnitude
equal to four units--for four quarts of milk in a gallon pail as truly
as for four separate quart-pails of milk; it is also, if we know it
well, the thing got by adding one to three or subtracting six from ten
or taking two two's or half of eight. To know the meaning of a number
means to know somewhat about it in all of these respects. The difficulty
has been the narrow vision of the extremists. A child must not be left
interminably counting; in fact the one-more-ness of the number series
can almost be had as a by-product. A child must not be restricted to
exercises with collections objectified as in Fig. 2 or stated in words
as so many apples, oranges, hats, pens, etc., when work with measurement
of continuous quantities with varying units--inches, feet, yards,
glassfuls, pints, quarts, seconds, minutes, hours, and the like--is
so easy and so significant. On the other hand, the elaboration of
artificial problems with fictitious units of measure just to have
relative magnitudes as in the exercises on page 5 is a wasteful
sacrifice. Similarly, special drills emphasizing the fact that eighteen
is eleven and seven, twelve and six, three less than twenty-one, and the
like, are simply idolatrous; these facts about eighteen, so far as they
are needed, are better learned in the course of actual column-addition
and -subtraction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account